Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gestalt Principles of Perception01:21

Gestalt Principles of Perception

Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...
Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Visual Agnosia01:12

Visual Agnosia

Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round end"...
Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
Light Acquisition02:16

Light Acquisition

In order to produce glucose, plants need to capture sufficient light energy. Many modern plants have evolved leaves specialized for light acquisition. Leaves can be only millimeters in width or tens of meters wide, depending on the environment. Due to competition for sunlight, evolution has driven the evolution of increasingly larger leaves and taller plants, to avoid shading by their neighbors with contaminant elaboration of root architecture and mechanisms to transport water and nutrients.
Focusing of Light in the Eye01:16

Focusing of Light in the Eye

Light rays enter the eye through the cornea, a transparent dome-shaped tissue that is the eye's outermost layer. The cornea bends or refracts, light rays traveling to the pupil. The shape of the cornea determines how much of the light is bent and whether the image will be focused correctly on the retina at the back of the eye. Once the light has passed through both refraction layers, it converges into a single focal point onto a small area. This is where photoreceptors start transforming...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enhancing the design of wine labels.

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same author

Sensory translation between audition and vision.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2023
Same author

Orthonasal olfactory influences on consumer food behaviour.

Appetite·2023
Same author

Using crossmodal correspondences as a tool in wine communication.

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same author

Synergistic Combination of Visual Features in Vision-Taste Crossmodal Correspondences.

Multisensory research·2023
Same author

Exploring crossmodal correspondences for future research in human movement augmentation.

Frontiers in psychology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Camille Koppen1, Charles Spence

  • 1Crossmodal Research Laboratory, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3UD, UK. camille.koppen@psy.ox.ac.uk

Experimental Brain Research
|March 3, 2007
PubMed
Summary

The Colavita visual dominance effect shows people often miss auditory cues when both visual and auditory stimuli are presented. This effect is linked to visual stimuli capturing more attention than auditory ones.

More Related Videos

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions
07:09

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions

Published on: May 2, 2019

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model
06:30

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Published on: May 24, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions
07:09

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions

Published on: May 2, 2019

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model
06:30

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Published on: May 24, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Multisensory Perception
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • The Colavita visual dominance effect describes a bias where auditory stimuli are overlooked in favor of visual stimuli during bimodal audiovisual tasks.
  • Previous research has explored factors like stimulus probability and response demands, but their role in the Colavita effect remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the underlying mechanisms of the Colavita visual dominance effect.
  • To determine if stimulus probability and response complexity influence the Colavita effect.
  • To examine the role of exogenous attention in visual dominance.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed speeded discrimination tasks with unimodal auditory, unimodal visual, and bimodal audiovisual stimuli.
  • Experiments varied stimulus presentation ratios and response key configurations (auditory, visual, bimodal).
  • Exogenous attention was manipulated using cued visual or auditory stimuli preceding bimodal targets.

Main Results:

  • The Colavita effect was consistently observed across different stimulus ratios and response demands, suggesting these factors are not primary drivers.
  • A significantly larger Colavita effect occurred when a visual cue preceded the bimodal target compared to an auditory cue.
  • This indicates that visual stimuli possess stronger exogenous attention-capturing properties.

Conclusions:

  • Stimulus probability and task response demands do not significantly explain the Colavita visual dominance effect.
  • The findings support the hypothesis that the Colavita effect is partly mediated by the superior ability of visual stimuli to capture exogenous attention.
  • This highlights the role of attentional mechanisms in multisensory integration and perception.