Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD

A complete procedure of testing a hypothesis about a population mean when the population standard deviation is unknown is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used; instead...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Robust evidence for theta-band rhythmicity in behavior across two dense-sampling datasets.

Communications psychology·2026

Same author

Adaptive variability in humans, pigeons, and rats.

Psychological review·2026

Same author

Cognitive flexibility versus stability via activation-based and weight-based adaptations.

Communications psychology·2026

Same author

Medial Frontal Theta Reduction Impairs Rule Switching via Prediction Error.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025

Same author

Different exploration strategies along the autism spectrum: diverging effects of autism diagnosis and autism traits.

Molecular autism·2025

Same author

Learning to be confident: How agents learn confidence based on prediction errors.

Cognition·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

A Computational Method to Quantify Fly Circadian Activity

A Computational Method to Quantify Fly Circadian Activity

Published on: October 28, 2017

How to compare two quantities? A computational model of flutter discrimination.

¹Ghent University, Belgium. Tom.Verguts@UGent.be

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

|March 6, 2007

Summary

This study proposes a neural network model for flicker discrimination, combining temporal assignment and quantity comparison. The model successfully replicates neural and behavioral findings, offering new insights into cognitive processes.

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

A Computational Method to Quantify Fly Circadian Activity

A Computational Method to Quantify Fly Circadian Activity

Published on: October 28, 2017

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Area of Science:

Cognitive Neuroscience
Computational Neuroscience
Neural Networks

Background:

Flicker discrimination is a key area of neural processing research.
Understanding flicker discrimination requires addressing temporal and quantity comparison aspects.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a novel neural network model for flicker discrimination.
To explain how temporal assignment and quantity comparison are integrated in neural processing.

Main Methods:

Developed a neural network model combining unsupervised and supervised learning.
Unsupervised learning clustered input features (stimulus + time window).
Supervised learning categorized the resulting clusters.

Main Results:

The trained model demonstrated a strong fit with existing neural data.
The model also accurately reflected observed behavioral properties.
The model provides a framework for understanding flicker discrimination mechanisms.

Conclusions:

Flicker discrimination involves both temporal assignment and quantity comparison.
The proposed neural network model offers a viable mechanism for solving these problems.
The model generates new predictions and links to other cognitive domains.