Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Specific, selective or preferential: comments on category specificity in neuroimaging.

Cyril Pernet1, Philippe G Schyns, Jean-Francois Demonet

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Glasgow, 58 Hillhead Street, Glasgow G12 8QB, UK. cyril@psy.gla.ac.uk <cyril@psy.gla.ac.uk>

Neuroimage
|March 6, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Building an open ecosystem for molecular neuroimaging: standards and tools from the OpenNeuroPET initiative.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Prefrontal and hippocampal microstructural gray matter following cognitive training under moderate hypoxia in mood disorders: a randomized controlled trial.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same author

Mood and Age Predict Cognitive Complaints in Memory Clinic Patients: A Machine-Learning and Linear Modeling Approach.

European journal of neurology·2026
Same author

International consensus for the assessment of social cognition in neurocognitive disorders: framework definition and clinical recommendations of the SIGNATURE initiative.

Alzheimer's research & therapy·2025
Same author

Executive functions predict time reference processing in French-speaking people with Alzheimer's disease.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Targeted serum metabolomic profiling and machine learning approach in Alzheimer's disease using the Alzheimer's disease diagnostics clinical study (ADDIA) cohort.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2025
Same journal

Brain-Inspired Large Model Mindreading.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Light on Broken Networks: Resting-State fNIRS as a Tool for Connectivity Mapping.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Criticism-Evoked Rumination Is Linked to Dynamic adjustments of the Left Superficial Amygdala in Adolescents.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

GeNED.ar cohort: Neuroimaging Resource for Aging Studies in an Admixed Population from Argentina.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

DTI-ALPS index correlates with poor neuromodulation outcomes of bilateral STN-DBS in Parkinson's disease patients: a prospective cohort study.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Decoding neuronal criticality firing patterns for large brain based EEG models.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

Functional neuroimaging aims to map brain activity. However, evidence for strict category-specific brain regions remains elusive, necessitating rigorous experimental validation for functional specialization.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroimaging
  • Functional Specialization

Background:

  • Functional neuroimaging seeks to identify stimulus-specific brain activity patterns.
  • Studies report distinct brain activation for object categories (faces, words, etc.).
  • Interpretations of category or domain specificity are debated, with alternative criteria used.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the concept of category specificity in functional neuroimaging.
  • To examine whether observed brain activation patterns truly demonstrate category-specific specialization.
  • To outline experimental conditions for conclusive evidence of functional specialization.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing functional neuroimaging literature.
  • Analysis of criteria used to infer functional specialization.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Theoretical framing based on Fodor's concept of category specificity.

    • Main Results:

    • Current brain activation patterns are insufficient to demonstrate strict category specificity.
    • Alternative interpretations of functional specialization exist.
    • Existing studies often lack the rigorous conditions for conclusive proof.

    Conclusions:

    • The demonstration of category-specific brain regions requires further rigorous investigation.
    • Existing evidence for functional specialization based on stimulus category is inconclusive.
    • Clear experimental paradigms are needed to establish definitive category-specific processing in the brain.