Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Intravascular Ultrasound Image-Based Finite Element Modeling Approach for Quantifying In Vivo Mechanical Properties of Human Coronary Artery
Published on: December 6, 2024
Is intravascular ultrasound the gold standard surrogate for clinically relevant atherosclerosis progression?
1Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195-8855, USA. bgbrown@u.washington.edu
Insights
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) plaque size changes may predict cardiovascular events in trials. However, concerns about IVUS limitations mean it cannot yet replace clinical event assessment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Medical Imaging Technology
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) clinical trials often rely on clinical events as primary endpoints.
- Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) provides detailed imaging of coronary plaque.
- The utility of IVUS-derived plaque progression as a surrogate for clinical events is under investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate whether progressive changes in IVUS-derived plaque size can reliably predict cardiovascular event risk in coronary disease trials.
- To determine if IVUS can serve as an efficient surrogate endpoint for clinical events in these trials.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing clinical trial data utilizing IVUS.
- Analysis of IVUS-derived plaque size indexes and their correlation with clinical outcomes.
- Comparison of IVUS findings with quantitative arteriography results.
- Discussion of the limitations and assumptions inherent in IVUS measurements.
Main Results:
- The question of whether IVUS-derived plaque changes are sufficiently predictive of cardiovascular events remains unanswered by current trial data.
- Evidence suggests IVUS *may* be a viable surrogate, but significant concerns persist.
- Concerns include physical limitations, fundamental assumptions, and interpretation challenges of IVUS measurements.
Conclusions:
- IVUS is a powerful tool for visualizing coronary plaque, but its role as a surrogate for clinical events in trials requires further validation.
- Despite potential, the reliability of IVUS for predicting cardiovascular risk cannot be assumed due to existing limitations.
- Further research and standardization are needed to establish IVUS as a definitive surrogate endpoint in coronary disease trials.
Abstract:
Are progressive changes in intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived indexes of plaque size sufficiently predictive of in-trial or future cardiovascular event risk that IVUS can serve as an efficient surrogate for clinical events in coronary disease trials? This question remains unanswered by clinical trials reported to date. Indeed, the answer may well be "yes." Nevertheless, there are enough concerns about the physical limitations, the fundamental assumptions, and the interpretation of the IVUS measurements that the answer cannot be taken for granted. Here, we review the evidence to date, discuss some of the concerns, and compare IVUS results with those of quantitative arteriography.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies