Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Quality, Safety, and Standards Organizations COVID-19 Impact Assessment: Lessons Learned and Compelling Needs.

NAM perspectives·2021

Same author

Risk adjusting Medicare Advantage star ratings for socioeconomic status.

The American journal of managed care·2018

Same author

Quality's quarter-century.

The American journal of managed care·2015

Same author

Moving beyond the breast cancer screening debate.

Journal of women's health (2002)·2014

Same author

Fifty years of age-based screening: time for a new risk-based screening approach.

Evidence-based medicine·2014

Same author

Diabetes quality measures.

JAMA·2011

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Performance-based measures: the early results are in.

Margaret E O'Kane¹

¹National Committee for Quality Assurance, 2000 L St. NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20036, USA. okane@ncqa.org

Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy : JMCP

|March 8, 2007

Summary

Pay for performance (P4P) initiatives incentivize better healthcare delivery by rewarding quality care. While both financial and nonfinancial incentives drive change, the return on investment for these programs remains unknown.

More Related Videos

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

Area of Science:

Health Services Research
Healthcare Management
Quality Improvement

Background:

Pay for performance (P4P) initiatives aim to enhance healthcare delivery and promote value-based care.
These programs reward quality care and efficient resource utilization, reducing disproportionate spending.

Purpose of the Study:

To review the fundamental principles, design, and current practices of P4P initiatives.
To analyze the results of P4P programs implemented in healthcare settings.

Main Methods:

Literature review of P4P initiative designs and outcomes.
Analysis of data from developmental P4P programs nationwide.

Main Results:

Financial and nonfinancial incentives have shown potential to motivate significant changes in healthcare delivery.
Key stakeholders driving P4P include employers, federal agencies, health plans, providers, and accreditors.

Conclusions:

Measurement, transparency, and accountability are crucial for a value-based healthcare system.
Organizations like the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) play a vital role in measuring and reporting healthcare quality.
The long-term return on investment for P4P initiatives is not yet established.