Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Three methods of implementing a picture archiving and communication system.

H K Huang1

  • 1Department of Radiological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles 90024-1721.

Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Effects of Shugan Jieyu capsules combined with Zolpidem on sleep quality and daytime cognitive function in insomnia with depressive symptoms patients].

Zhonghua yi xue za zhi·2025
Same author

Medical imaging, PACS, and imaging informatics: retrospective.

Radiological physics and technology·2013
Same author

Medical imaging informatics simulators: a tutorial.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2013
Same author

A DICOM-based 2nd generation Molecular Imaging Data Grid implementing the IHE XDS-i integration profile.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2011
Same author

From PACS to Web-based ePR system with image distribution for enterprise-level filmless healthcare delivery.

Radiological physics and technology·2011
Same author

Short history of PACS. Part I: USA.

European journal of radiology·2011

Implementing a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) involves three main strategies: in-house integration, manufacturer-led development, or turnkey solutions. Each approach offers distinct advantages and disadvantages for healthcare facilities.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Health Informatics
  • Radiology Information Systems

Background:

  • Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) integrate diverse components like imaging devices, networks, and databases.
  • Effective PACS implementation is crucial for modern radiology departments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline and evaluate three distinct strategies for implementing PACS.
  • To provide a comparative analysis of the pros and cons of each PACS implementation approach.

Main Methods:

  • Describing a systems integrator approach where the institution manages PACS development.
  • Detailing a manufacturer-contracted approach based on departmental needs.
  • Explaining the turnkey system acquisition model with customization.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The systems integrator approach offers control but requires significant expertise.
  • The manufacturer-led approach balances customization with external development resources.
  • Turnkey systems provide rapid deployment but may limit flexibility.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of PACS implementation strategy depends on institutional resources, technical capabilities, and specific clinical requirements.
  • Each method presents a unique trade-off between control, cost, customization, and implementation time.
  • Understanding these approaches aids in selecting the most suitable PACS solution for a given healthcare setting.