Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Appraising and comparing pressure ulcer guidelines.

Peter Wimpenny1, Ruben van Zelm

  • 1Joanna Briggs Collaborating Centre, The Robert Gordon University, Faculty of Health and Social Care, Gartdee Campus, Garthdee, Aberdeen, Scotland. p.wimpenny@rgu.ac.uk

Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
|March 16, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Health promotion for blood donors: A scoping review.

Public health in practice (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

Integrated maternity care: A concept analysis.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Competencies Emergency and Mental Health Nurses Need in Triage in Acute Mental Health Care: A Narrative Review.

Journal of emergency nursing·2023
Same author

Overview on the target population and methods used in care pathway projects: A narrative review.

International journal of clinical practice·2021
Same author

Process evaluation: evidence-based quality indicators in clinical practice, scholarship and pedagogy.

JBI evidence implementation·2021
Same author

Qualitative Evaluation of the Implementation of a Care Pathway for Colorectal Cancer Surgery.

Qualitative health research·2020

This study compared four national pressure ulcer guidelines using the AGREE instrument. Findings reveal variability in quality and content, highlighting areas for improvement in pressure ulcer prevention and management guidelines.

Area of Science:

  • Nursing
  • Healthcare Quality
  • Clinical Guidelines

Background:

  • Limited comparative evaluations exist for nursing guidelines on pressure ulcer prevention and management.
  • Existing guidelines lack assessment against standardized quality indicators.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comparatively appraise four national pressure ulcer guidelines.
  • To identify similarities and differences in guideline quality and content.
  • To evaluate the contribution of guidelines to clinical practice.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the AGREE (Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation) instrument for international comparative appraisal.
  • Added two domains to assess guideline comparability and practice contribution.
  • An international group conducted the appraisal.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Domain scores showed partial agreement among reviewers.
  • One guideline set achieved the highest scores across most AGREE domains.
  • Significant variability exists between pressure ulcer guidelines, indicating common areas for development.

Conclusions:

  • Results question the definitive "best" pressure ulcer guideline based on AGREE scoring alone.
  • All reviewed guidelines exhibit shortcomings requiring quality improvement.
  • Practitioner engagement is crucial for guideline implementation, considering factors beyond development quality.