Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
Calibration trumps confidence as a basis for witness credibility
Elizabeth R Tenney1, Robert J MacCoun, Barbara A Spellman
1Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, VA 22904-4400, USA. tenney@virginia.edu
Abstract:
Confident witnesses are deemed more credible than unconfident ones, and accurate witnesses are deemed more credible than inaccurate ones. But are those effects independent? Two experiments show that errors in testimony damage the overall credibility of witnesses who were confident about the erroneous testimony more than that of witnesses who were not confident about it. Furthermore, after making an error, less confident witnesses may appear more credible than more confident ones. Our interpretation of these results is that people make inferences about source calibration when evaluating testimony and other social communication.
Related Concept Videos
Instrument Calibration
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Accuracy and Precision
