[Value of the informed consent in digestive surgery? Prospective study 259 cases]

In 1997 the Supreme Court of Justice decreed that "the doctor is responsible for giving his patient certain information and is obliged to prove that the information has been given". French surgical societies recommend using a form of informed consent signed by the patient applicable to all practices.

To evaluate a step taken systematically since 1999 in our department.

A prospective study was put into place for 259 patients candidate for elective surgery. All patients signed and returned the "informed consent" before surgery. The day of leaving the hospital, they answered a post-operative questionnaire to evaluate what they remembered of the "informed consent form" and the quality of information.

Ninety three per cent of them remembered it. Eight per cent signed it without reading it. Eighty two per cent of the patients think that this document is useful for their medical records. Among the patients who did not read the informed consent form: 38% wished it gave more information, whereas only 16% of those who had read it, considered the given information inadequate. This difference is statistically (p=0.03) significant.

The informed consent form gives a lot of information to the patients, but the surgeon is still obliged to do likewise. Patients who did not read the consent were less satisfied with the given information than those who had read it. The positive reaction of the patients in favour of the form makes it evident that the existence of the form reassures them.