Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

12:54
Simultaneous Brightfield, Fluorescence, and Optical Coherence Tomographic Imaging of Contracting Cardiac Trabeculae Ex Vivo
Published on: October 2, 2021
Contrast imaging with chirped excitation
Yang Sun1, Dustin E Kruse, Katherine W Ferrara
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA. ywsun@ucdavis.edu
Summary
Chirped excitation significantly improves contrast-to-tissue ratio (CTR) and tissue rejection for ultrasound contrast imaging. This method allows for reduced acoustic intensity (I(SPPA)) while maintaining high contrast, enhancing imaging safety and efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Ultrasound imaging
- Acoustic wave propagation
- Biomedical engineering
Background:
- Coded excitation enhances ultrasound imaging by increasing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and penetration depth.
- Wideband signals are hypothesized to improve contrast-to-tissue ratio (CTR) with contrast agents.
- Nonlinear contrast agent properties complicate coded excitation in contrast imaging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose and evaluate two chirped excitation methods for contrast agent imaging.
- To assess the impact of chirped excitation on contrast-to-tissue ratio (CTR) and tissue rejection.
- To compare chirped excitation with conventional tone burst insonation at low mechanical index (MI).
Main Methods:
- Two chirped excitation methods: single chirp and chirp sequence, with mechanical index (MI) from 0.05 to 0.34.
- Clutter filter and matched filter for single chirp; echo subtraction for chirp sequence to reject tissue echoes.
- Acoustic experiments comparing CTR and tissue rejection ratio (TRR) for chirp vs. tone burst at constant spatial peak temporal averaged intensity (I(SPTA)).
Main Results:
- Chirped excitation increased CTR by 4 dB to 8 dB compared to tone burst.
- Achieving a 15 dB CTR required 6 dB lower spatial peak pulse averaged intensity (I(SPPA)) with chirped excitation.
- Chirp sequence achieved over 10 dB higher tissue rejection ratio (TRR) than tone burst phase inversion.
- Axial resolution difference between chirp and tone burst was approximately 220 micrometers.
Conclusions:
- Chirped excitation offers significant advantages for ultrasound contrast imaging.
- Improved CTR and TRR allow for reduced acoustic intensity, enhancing safety.
- Deconvolution techniques can recover spatial resolution lost due to microbubble response.

