Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

A computed tomography-based protocol vs conventional clinical mark-up for breast electron boost.

A T Bates1, C-L Swift, W Kwa

  • 1Department of Clinical Oncology, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK, and Department of Medical Physics, British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. andrew.bates1@virgin.net

Clinical Oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
|March 24, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigating fine-tuning versus zero-shot learning for general large language models when predicting cancer survival from initial oncology consultation documents.

ESMO real world data and digital oncology·2026
Same author

Cost-effectiveness analysis of anal cancer screening in women with cervical neoplasia in British Columbia, Canada.

BMC health services research·2016
Same author

Afatinib use in non-small cell lung cancer previously sensitive to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors: the United Kingdom Named Patient Programme.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2014
Same author

Stereotactic body radiotherapy: volumetric modulated arc therapy versus 3D non-coplanar conformal radiotherapy for the treatment of early stage lung cancer.

Technology in cancer research & treatment·2013
Same author

Inefficient cerebral recruitment as a vulnerability marker for schizophrenia.

Psychological medicine·2012
Same author

Predictors of survival in patients with non-curative stage IV cancer and malignant bowel obstruction.

Journal of surgical oncology·2010
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Computed tomography (CT) planning for breast radiotherapy boosts improves accuracy over conventional methods. This study found CT planning enhances tumor bed coverage and can often utilize the initial CT scan for planning, improving patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Radiation oncology
  • Medical imaging
  • Surgical oncology

Background:

  • Whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) with computed tomography (CT) planning enhances breast coverage and reduces normal tissue dose.
  • CT planning may improve the accuracy of tumor bed boost treatments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Compare breast boost volumes from clinical mark-up versus CT planning.
  • Assess tumor bed volume changes between initial and boost treatment CT scans.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated 47 women receiving adjuvant WBRT and electron boost post-breast-conserving surgery.
  • Compared clinical boost portal definition with CT-delineated tumor bed clinical target volume (CTV).
  • Analyzed planning target volume (PTV) dose coverage (V90, V80) and CTV volume changes.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Mean V90 for PTV was 61%, with lower electron energy and small fields associated with lower coverage.
  • Mean CTV decreased by 4.3 cm³, influenced by the interval between surgery and CT.
  • On average, 61 cm³ of normal tissue received 90% of the prescribed dose.

Conclusions:

  • Conventional clinical breast boost planning demonstrates inaccuracies.
  • CT-planned electron boosts, combined with surgical clips, mammograms, and pathology, offer optimal tumor site coverage.
  • Boost planning can often be performed using the initial CT scan.