Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evolving roles of Data Coordinating Centers in multisite research: Challenges and adaptations from a rapid scoping review.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2026
Same author

Correction: Working to Increase Stability through Exercise (WISE): screening, recruitment, and baseline characteristics.

Trials·2026
Same author

Postanesthesia Apnea in Former Preterm and Term Infants: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Anesthesiology·2026
Same author

Multivariate equivalence and component-wise superiority tests for paired samples.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same author

Semaglutide, weight loss, and cardiovascular outcomes in the SELECT trial.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Hyperglycemia During Acute Pancreatitis and Progression to Early-Onset Diabetes After Recovery: Preliminary Findings From the Diabetes Related to Acute Pancreatitis and Its Mechanisms (DREAM) Study.

Diabetes care·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

A matched crossover design for clinical trials.

Laura J Simon1, Vernon M Chinchilli

  • 1Penn State University (Main Campus), 328 Thomas Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA. lsimon@stat.psu.edu

Contemporary Clinical Trials
|March 27, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Paired crossover designs, combining subject matching and self-control, enhance clinical trial efficiency. This design is more effective when within-pair correlations on treatments exceed correlations across treatments.

More Related Videos

Creating Matched In vivo/In vitro Patient-Derived Model Pairs of PDX and PDX-Derived Organoids for Cancer Pharmacology Research
04:49

Creating Matched In vivo/In vitro Patient-Derived Model Pairs of PDX and PDX-Derived Organoids for Cancer Pharmacology Research

Published on: May 5, 2021

Frequency and Distribution of Crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by SNP Genotyping using Real-time PCR
06:18

Frequency and Distribution of Crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by SNP Genotyping using Real-time PCR

Published on: July 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

Creating Matched In vivo/In vitro Patient-Derived Model Pairs of PDX and PDX-Derived Organoids for Cancer Pharmacology Research
04:49

Creating Matched In vivo/In vitro Patient-Derived Model Pairs of PDX and PDX-Derived Organoids for Cancer Pharmacology Research

Published on: May 5, 2021

Frequency and Distribution of Crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by SNP Genotyping using Real-time PCR
06:18

Frequency and Distribution of Crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by SNP Genotyping using Real-time PCR

Published on: July 11, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Respiratory Medicine

Background:

  • Clinical trials frequently employ subject matching or crossover designs to isolate treatment effects.
  • Combining these principles into a paired crossover design offers potential advantages for specific research questions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the application of a paired 2x2 crossover design in two National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute asthma clinical trials.
  • To evaluate the efficiency of the paired crossover design compared to independent crossover designs.

Main Methods:

  • The study utilized a paired 2x2 crossover design in the Beta Adrenergic Response by GEnotype (BARGE) and Smoking Modulates Outcomes of Glucocorticoid (SMOG) Therapy in Asthma studies.
  • Efficiency was assessed by comparing the paired crossover design to two independent crossover designs, focusing on the treatment-by-pairing interaction term.

Main Results:

  • The paired 2x2 crossover design is more efficient than two independent crossover designs when correlations between paired subjects on the same treatments are higher than on different treatments.
  • This efficiency gain is expected to hold true in most clinical trial scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • Paired crossover designs integrating matching and self-control are a valuable and efficient methodology for clinical trials.
  • This design warrants serious consideration when both matching and crossover elements are beneficial for investigating treatment effects.