Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs01:09

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

624
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
624
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.2K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.2K
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

1.7K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
1.7K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

3.4K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.4K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

479
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
479
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

2.6K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
2.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evolving roles of Data Coordinating Centers in multisite research: Challenges and adaptations from a rapid scoping review.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2026
Same author

Correction: Working to Increase Stability through Exercise (WISE): screening, recruitment, and baseline characteristics.

Trials·2026
Same author

Postanesthesia Apnea in Former Preterm and Term Infants: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Anesthesiology·2026
Same author

Semaglutide, weight loss, and cardiovascular outcomes in the SELECT trial.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Hyperglycemia During Acute Pancreatitis and Progression to Early-Onset Diabetes After Recovery: Preliminary Findings From the Diabetes Related to Acute Pancreatitis and Its Mechanisms (DREAM) Study.

Diabetes care·2026
Same author

Associations between dietary patterns and diabetes in patients with acute pancreatitis: a cross-sectional analysis from the DREAM study.

Nutrition journal·2026
Same journal

Correction.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Leveraging external controls in clinical trials: estimands, estimation, assumptions.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Special issue of nonclinical statistics in regulatory applications guest editors' notes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Comparison of flexible parametric modeling and nonparametric methods to estimate restricted mean survival time: A simulation study.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Simulated treatment comparisons with jackknife pseudo values for estimating population-adjusted marginal treatment effects.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Sample sizes for randomized controlled trials utilizing Bayesian response adaptive randomization for continuous outcomes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 29, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K

Multivariate equivalence and component-wise superiority tests for paired samples.

Yanxi Hu1, Vernon M Chinchilli1

  • 1Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|April 27, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces new statistical tests for one-sample multivariate equivalence and superiority, addressing limitations in existing methods. The developed approach effectively detects equivalence and component-wise superiority while controlling error rates.

Keywords:
Likelihood Ratio Bootstrap TestMultivariate equivalence testintersection-union testmultivariate component-wise superiority testmultivariate paired comparison

More Related Videos

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.6K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 29, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.6K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Existing multivariate equivalence and superiority tests are primarily for two-sample settings, with limited options for one-sample scenarios.
  • Current multivariate superiority tests often conflate superiority and non-inferiority, lacking purely one-sided joint superiority tests.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the scarcity of one-sample multivariate testing methods.
  • To develop and validate novel statistical tests for paired multivariate equivalence and component-wise superiority.

Main Methods:

  • Adaptation of the Intersection-Union Test.
  • Development of Likelihood Ratio Nonparametric and Parametric Bootstrap Tests.
  • Utilizing simulation studies and real-data application for validation.

Main Results:

  • The proposed methods successfully detect multivariate equivalence and component-wise superiority.
  • Type I error rates are effectively controlled in simulation studies.
  • The approach demonstrates practical utility through real-data application.

Conclusions:

  • The combined classical likelihood methods and bootstrap resampling offer a robust and adaptable solution.
  • This work expands the toolkit for one-sample multivariate statistical testing.
  • The developed tests are powerful for paired multivariate equivalence and component-wise superiority analysis.