Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence the...
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence the...
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
Molecular Models02:00

Molecular Models

Physical models representing molecular architectures of chemical compounds play essential roles in understanding chemistry. The use of molecular models makes it easier to visualize the structures and shapes of atoms and molecules.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CSCAN: Conformational Analysis of Macrocyclic Peptides through NMR Chemical Shifts.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Structure-based pose prediction: Non-cognate docking extended to macrocyclic ligands.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2024
Same author

From UK-2A to florylpicoxamid: Active learning to identify a mimic of a macrocyclic natural product.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2024
Same author

Correction: Complex peptide macrocycle optimization: combining NMR restraints with conformational analysis to guide structure-based and ligand-based design.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2024
Same author

Complex peptide macrocycle optimization: combining NMR restraints with conformational analysis to guide structure-based and ligand-based design.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2023
Same author

Unmasking the True Identity of Rapamycin's Minor Conformer.

Journal of natural products·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

Surflex-Dock 2.1: robust performance from ligand energetic modeling, ring flexibility, and knowledge-based search.

Ajay N Jain1

  • 1Department of Biopharmaceutical Sciences, UCSF Cancer Research Institute, University of California-San Francisco, Box 0128, San Francisco, CA 94143-0128, USA. ajain@jainlab.org

Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
|March 28, 2007
PubMed
Summary

The Surflex flexible molecular docking method now includes enhanced search capabilities, improving both accuracy and screening utility. This advanced approach offers superior performance in identifying potential drug candidates compared to existing methods.

More Related Videos

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Structure-Guided Design and Development of Novel Cyclophilin A Inhibitors and Ganoderiol-F Derivatives: An In-Silico Approach
10:01

Structure-Guided Design and Development of Novel Cyclophilin A Inhibitors and Ganoderiol-F Derivatives: An In-Silico Approach

Published on: June 23, 2026

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Structure-Guided Design and Development of Novel Cyclophilin A Inhibitors and Ganoderiol-F Derivatives: An In-Silico Approach
10:01

Structure-Guided Design and Development of Novel Cyclophilin A Inhibitors and Ganoderiol-F Derivatives: An In-Silico Approach

Published on: June 23, 2026

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry and cheminformatics
  • Drug discovery and molecular modeling

Background:

  • Traditional molecular docking methods often have limitations in accurately representing ligand flexibility and guiding search processes.
  • Previous Surflex versions focused on alignment and torsional space, limiting the exploration of complex ligand conformations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To enhance the Surflex flexible molecular docking method by improving its search capabilities for increased accuracy and screening utility.
  • To incorporate ligand energetics and knowledge-based interactions to guide the docking search process more effectively.

Main Methods:

  • Incorporation of a small-molecule force field to extend the search into Cartesian coordinates, enabling dynamic ring flexibility and all-atom optimization.
  • Integration of knowledge-based molecular interactions between ligand fragments and target proteins to guide the search process.
  • Validation using multiple publicly available benchmark datasets to assess docking accuracy and screening utility against other methods.

Main Results:

  • Surflex-Dock 2.1 demonstrates comparable docking accuracy to the best available molecular docking methods.
  • The enhanced Surflex method shows robust and superior performance in screening utility, achieving approximately double the screening enrichment.
  • The new approach supports dynamic ring flexibility and all-atom optimization of docked ligand poses.

Conclusions:

  • The generalized Surflex method, with its extended search capabilities, offers significant improvements in both docking accuracy and screening utility.
  • Surflex-Dock 2.1 provides a powerful and robust tool for drug discovery, outperforming other methods in screening enrichment.
  • The integration of force fields and knowledge-based interactions represents a significant advancement in flexible molecular docking.