Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

Legal billing for pathology services.

David M Glaser1, Katherine J Bennett

  • 1Fredrikson & Byron's Health Law Group, Minneapolis, USA.

Minnesota Medicine
|March 29, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Primary care physicians in Minnesota can legally add markups to pathologist fees when billing third-party payers. This practice is permissible under federal and state laws if it covers the primary care group's extra work and risk.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of fentanyl on the induction dose and minimum infusion rate of alfaxalone preventing movement in dogs.

Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia·2018
Same author

Legal issues affecting ancillaries and orthopedic practice.

The Orthopedic clinics of North America·2007
Same author

Improving the bottom line through a better understanding of rules and statutes.

The Journal of medical practice management : MPM·2005
Same author

Keeping internal chart reviews from being used against you: 11 useful strategies.

The Journal of medical practice management : MPM·2004
Same author

Improving reimbursement: what are the options?

Minnesota medicine·2004
Same author

Regulation of ancillary services.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2003

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Law
  • Medical Billing
  • Pathology Services

Background:

  • Physicians debated the legality and ethics of primary care physicians marking up pathologist fees.
  • Billing for pathology services involves complex legal and ethical considerations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore federal and state laws regarding physician markups on pathology services.
  • To determine the legal and ethical permissibility of such billing practices.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of relevant federal and state legislation.
  • Review of legal precedents and ethical guidelines concerning medical billing.

Main Results:

  • Both federal and state laws permit primary care physicians to add markups to pathologist fees.
  • Markups are allowed provided they represent reasonable compensation for additional work and risk undertaken by the primary care provider.

Conclusions:

  • The practice of primary care physicians marking up pathology service fees is legally permissible.
  • Ethical considerations require that markups are directly related to the value and risk added by the primary care provider.

More Related Videos

Establishment of a Clinic-based Biorepository
07:50

Establishment of a Clinic-based Biorepository

Published on: May 29, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

Establishment of a Clinic-based Biorepository
07:50

Establishment of a Clinic-based Biorepository

Published on: May 29, 2017