Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Risk and opportunity in upgrading the US drinking water infrastructure system
Jeffrey W Rogers1, Garrick E Louis
1Department of Systems and Information Engineering, SEAS, University of Virginia, Olsson Hall, 151 Engineers Way, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA. jwr@centralva.net <jwr@centralva.net>
This study introduces a practical risk assessment tool for drinking water infrastructure (DWI) decision-makers to manage budget uncertainty. Proactive asset management ensures system reliability and optimizes capital improvement programs.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Engineering
- Infrastructure Management
- Risk Assessment
Background:
- Drinking water infrastructure (DWI) decision-makers face challenges in managing financial uncertainty within capital improvement programs (CIP).
- Maintaining desired system reliability [r(f)] while controlling budgetary impacts is crucial for DWI.
- Existing methods may not adequately incorporate the probability of system failure [p(f)] into financial planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a practical risk assessment methodology for DWI decision-makers.
- To demonstrate the value of an objective risk assessment tool for estimating sensitivity to system failure risk (R).
- To incorporate the probability of system failure [p(f)] into CIP budgetary analysis and evaluate its effects.
Main Methods:
- Development of a risk assessment methodology integrating probability of system failure [p(f)] into CIP analysis.
- Estimation of DWI decision-maker sensitivity to risk of system failure (R) using rate of reinvestment (RR).
- Evaluation of the impact of p(f) on expected CIP budgetary outcomes.
Main Results:
- The proposed tool helps manage the magnitude of expected budgetary impacts by adjusting sensitivity to risk (R) via the rate of reinvestment (RR).
- Proactively managing risk (R) to maintain desired system reliability [r(f)] effectively mitigates uncertainty in CIP budgetary outcomes.
- The methodology provides DWI decision-makers with a tool to reduce budgetary uncertainty in resource allocation for operational, repair, maintenance, and expansion activities.
Conclusions:
- DWI decision-makers can achieve positive budgetary outcomes by adopting risk-avoidance strategies.
- Proactive asset management (AM) is key to mitigating financial uncertainty and ensuring system reliability.
- The practical risk assessment methodology enhances objective decision-making for DWI within CIP constraints.
Related Concept Videos
Quality of Water
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Multiple Pipe Systems
Series Configuration
In a series configuration, fluid flows sequentially from one pipe...
Design Example: Designing a Residential Plumbing System
Regulation of Water Output
Regulation of Water Intake

