Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Benefit sharing: it's time for a definition.

D Schroeder1

  • 1Centre for Professional Ethics, University of Central Lancashire, Harrington Building, Preston PR1 2HE, UK. dschroeder@uclan.ac.uk

Journal of Medical Ethics
|April 3, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Implementing a cirrhosis order set in a tertiary healthcare system: a theory-informed formative evaluation.

BMC health services research·2023
Same author

Mouse models of NADK2 deficiency analyzed for metabolic and gene expression changes to elucidate pathophysiology.

Human molecular genetics·2022
Same author

Agitation in adults in the post-anaesthesia care unit after general anaesthesia.

British journal of anaesthesia·2018
Same author

A negative view of menopause: does the type of symptom matter?

Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society·2016
Same author

Differential Gene Expression in Coiled versus Flow-Diverter-Treated Aneurysms: RNA Sequencing Analysis in a Rabbit Aneurysm Model.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2016
Same author

Preclinical Testing of a Novel Thin Film Nitinol Flow-Diversion Stent in a Rabbit Elastase Aneurysm Model.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2015
Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Normalising transparency: an argument for requiring generative AI use declarations in all manuscripts-with a call for commentaries.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

Benefit sharing is crucial in international law and ethics but lacks a clear definition. This paper proposes a precise definition by integrating legal guidelines and ethical discussions to reduce ambiguity.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • International Law
  • Political Philosophy

Background:

  • Benefit sharing is a recurring theme in international discourse over the last 20 years.
  • Despite its significance in law, medical ethics, and political philosophy, benefit sharing lacks a precise definition.
  • The absence of a clear definition creates ambiguity across disciplines that utilize the concept.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a comprehensive and precise definition of benefit sharing.
  • To resolve the ambiguity surrounding the concept of benefit sharing in academic and legal contexts.
  • To bridge the gap between legal guidelines and ethical considerations in defining benefit sharing.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis integrating legal frameworks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of ethical debates surrounding benefit sharing.
  • Synthesis of existing literature to formulate a new definition.

    • Main Results:

    • A novel definition of benefit sharing is proposed.
    • The definition consolidates legal and ethical perspectives.
    • The proposed definition aims to eliminate ambiguity.

    Conclusions:

    • A clear definition of benefit sharing is essential for consistent application in international law and ethics.
    • The proposed definition provides a framework for understanding and implementing benefit sharing.
    • This work contributes to reducing conceptual ambiguity in a critical area of global discourse.