Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Risks, values, and decision making surrounding pregnancy.

Anne Drapkin Lyerly1, Lisa M Mitchell, Elizabeth M Armstrong

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Trent Center for Bioethics, Humanities, and History of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Obstetrics and Gynecology
|April 3, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ethical complexities in contraceptive mandates for adolescent clinical trial participation: a qualitative analysis of U.S. adolescents' perspectives.

BMC medical ethics·2026
Same author

Efficacy of Tonlamarsen in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension: The KARDINAL Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026
Same author

Comparative Effect of Two Enhanced Prenatal Care Models on Care Experiences: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same author

A study of implementation fidelity to an adapted community-based model of enhanced group prenatal care.

Translational behavioral medicine·2026
Same author

Enhanced Prenatal Care Models and Postpartum Depression: The EMBRACE Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Adolescent views on participating in HIV biomedical research during pregnancy: a qualitative analysis of motivators and barriers.

AIDS care·2026
Same journal

The Political Determinants of Obstetric Prescribing.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Risk of Adverse Maternal Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Milestones in Motion: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Ebola Virus in Pregnancy.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

A Quality-Improvement Study Evaluating Three Postpartum Prophylactic Oxytocin Rates and Blood Loss After Vaginal Birth.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

The Effects of Climate Change on Obstetric and Gynecologic Health.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
See all related articles

Managing medical risk during pregnancy is complex. Current approaches often overlook patient values and the risks of inaction, potentially harming both mothers and infants.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Risk Management in Healthcare
  • Reproductive Medicine

Background:

  • Risk assessment, communication, and management are critical in medicine, especially during pregnancy.
  • Decision-making in pregnancy involves complex ethical and clinical considerations.
  • Existing practices may not adequately balance maternal and fetal well-being.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze common tendencies in risk perception and management during pregnancy.
  • To identify how these tendencies impact clinical decisions and health policy.
  • To evaluate the alignment of current practices with evidence-based and patient-centered care.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of common scenarios in medical decision-making during pregnancy.
  • Examination of risk assessment frameworks in reproductive health.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of clinical care and research protection protocols.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified three key tendencies in risk management: focusing solely on probabilities, prioritizing fetal risk over maternal well-being, and neglecting risks of non-intervention.
    • These tendencies can lead to decisions that are not evidence-based.
    • Current risk management may detrimentally affect both women and infants.

    Conclusions:

    • Current approaches to risk in pregnancy may be flawed, leading to suboptimal care.
    • Re-evaluation of risk perception and communication is necessary for patient-centered care.
    • Balancing maternal values, fetal safety, and the risks of intervention/non-intervention is crucial.