Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rapid response systems: a systematic review.

Bradford D Winters1, Julius Cuong Pham, Elizabeth A Hunt

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, MD, USA.

Critical Care Medicine
|April 7, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interventions to improve timely cancer diagnosis: an integrative review.

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)·2024
Same author

Rapid Response Systems.

Critical care clinics·2024
Same author

Pulse Oximetry Con: Stop Living in the Cave.

Critical care medicine·2023
Same author

Circulating bile acid concentrations and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Guatemala.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2022
Same author

Reclassifying the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Residual Tumor Classification According to the Extent of Nodal Dissection for NSCLC: One Size Does Not Fit All.

Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer·2022
Same author

Outcomes and Revenue Generation of a Community-based Screening at a Center in the United States: The SToP Glaucoma Program.

Journal of glaucoma·2022
Same journal

The authors reply.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same journal

Attracting Emergency Medicine Graduates to Surgical Critical Care Training Programs.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same journal

The authors reply.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond a Snapshot: Tracking Family Prognostic Expectations in the ICU.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same journal

The authors reply.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same journal

Plasma Levels of Soluble ST2 Reflect Extrapulmonary Organ Dysfunction and Predict Outcomes in Acute Respiratory Failure: Beware of Potential Confounders.

Critical care medicine·2026
See all related articles

Rapid response systems (RRS) show weak evidence for reducing hospital mortality and cardiac arrest. More large randomized trials are needed to confirm the effectiveness of RRS before widespread adoption.

Area of Science:

  • Medical research
  • Clinical interventions
  • Patient safety

Background:

  • Rapid response systems (RRS) are proposed to identify and manage deteriorating patients on general hospital wards.
  • Effective early intervention is crucial for improving patient outcomes in hospitals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To perform a meta-analysis assessing the impact of RRS on hospital mortality and cardiac arrest rates.
  • To synthesize evidence from existing studies on the efficacy of RRS.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (1990-2005).
  • Inclusion of observational studies and randomized trials reporting hospital mortality and cardiac arrest data.
  • Meta-analysis of data from eight selected studies involving adult patients.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Pooled analysis of two randomized studies showed a relative risk of 0.76 for hospital mortality (95% CI, 0.39-1.48).
  • Observational studies (five) indicated a relative risk of 0.87 for hospital mortality (95% CI, 0.73-1.04).
  • Evidence for reduced cardiac arrest rates was stronger in observational studies (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.92) than in the single randomized study (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.79-1.13).

Conclusions:

  • Current evidence suggests a potential but weak association between RRS and reduced hospital mortality and cardiac arrest.
  • Limitations include study quality, wide confidence intervals, and heterogeneity, hindering definitive conclusions on RRS effectiveness.
  • Large-scale randomized controlled trials are essential to establish the efficacy of RRS as a standard care intervention.