Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bone morphogenetic proteins and bone defects: a systematic review.

Federico Mussano1, Giovannino Ciccone, Manuela Ceccarelli

  • 1Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Turin, Italy.

Spine
|April 7, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dermatitis Herpetiformis in Celiac Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

United European gastroenterology journal·2026
Same author

Recognition of eating episodes via commercial smartwatch sensors analysis.

PLOS digital health·2026
Same author

Polyhydroxyalkanoates in Bone Alloplastic Materials: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.

Polymers·2026
Same author

Renoir phase III Rituximab-Lenalidomide vs Rituximab as Maintenance Treatment in Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma.

Blood advances·2026
Same author

Basket and umbrella trials in pediatric precision medicine: a systematic review of designs, opportunities, and challenges.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

Assessing the Angiogenic Potential of Poly(ε-Caprolactone) PCL/Bioactive Glass Composites in a Co-Culture Model of ASCs and HMEC-1.

Biomedicines·2026

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) show slightly greater efficacy than traditional bone defect treatments in spinal fusion. Further research is needed to confirm BMPs

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are increasingly utilized in bone defect repair.
  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide a robust basis for evaluating healthcare interventions.
  • Systematic reviews focusing on RCTs are crucial for evidence-based practice in bone regeneration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and compare the efficacy of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) against traditional bone defect treatments.
  • To evaluate BMPs' effectiveness in bone regeneration compared to techniques like autologous bone grafting.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted.
  • Databases searched included MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to May 31, 2006.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Studies comparing bone regeneration via BMPs versus traditional methods were included.

    • Main Results:

    • Seventeen publications met the inclusion criteria.
    • Meta-analysis was feasible only for vertebral defect subgroup, showing BMPs had statistically significant greater efficacy than traditional techniques.
    • Significant heterogeneity across studies (site, dosage, carrier, outcome measures) limited broader meta-analysis.

    Conclusions:

    • BMPs may eliminate the need for autologous bone harvesting in vertebral defect treatment.
    • Evidence suggests a concentration of 1.5 mg/mL for BMPs in treating tibial fractures.
    • Further high-quality RCTs are recommended to fully elucidate BMPs' clinical effectiveness.