Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Constructivist coding: learning from selective feedback.

Ebba Elwin1, Peter Juslin, Henrik Olsson

  • 1Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. ebba.elwin@psyk.uu.se

Psychological Science
|April 12, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Social networks affect redistribution decisions and polarization.

PNAS nexus·2025
Same author

Development and retrospective validation of an artificial intelligence system for diagnostic assessment of prostate biopsies: study protocol.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Enriching Psychological Research by Exploring the Source and Nature of Noise.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2025
Same author

Physical Color Calibration of Digital Pathology Scanners for Robust Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Cancer Diagnosis.

Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc·2025
Same author

Further perceptions of probability: Accurate, stepwise updating is contingent on prior information about the task and the response mode.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024
Same author

Networks of beliefs: An integrative theory of individual- and social-level belief dynamics.

Psychological review·2024
Same journal

A Field Experiment Testing Whether Accountability Reduces Racial Gaps in Performance Evaluations.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Does Testosterone Affect Cognitive Reflection? Evidence From a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study of 1,000 Participants.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Does Overconfidence Really Confer Adaptive Benefits to Children's Learning?

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

How Does the Mind Grow? Cross-Cultural Intuitive Theories of Mental Development.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Not All Practice Is Created Equal: Longitudinal Evidence From Over 40,000 Chess Players.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Eye Glint as a Novel Perceptual Cue in Human Vision.

Psychological science·2026
See all related articles

Learning from selective feedback in real-world scenarios does not impair decision-making performance. People reconstruct experiences from general knowledge rather than merely recording outcomes, challenging assumptions in cognitive models.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Machine Learning Theory

Background:

  • Real-world learning often involves selective feedback, unlike the complete feedback assumed in most cognitive models.
  • Existing models of learning, judgment, and categorization may not accurately reflect naturalistic learning conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of selective feedback on decision-making performance.
  • To explore how individuals process and encode experiences gained through selective feedback.

Main Methods:

  • Empirical investigation of decision-making tasks.
  • Analysis of how participants coded their experiences under biased feedback conditions.

Main Results:

  • Performance was not negatively affected by learning with selective and biased feedback.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Acquired experience was a reconstruction based on general task knowledge, not just observed outcomes.
  • Conclusions:

    • Selective feedback in learning does not necessarily impair decision-making.
    • Cognitive processes involve reconstructing experience from broader knowledge, not just rote memorization of outcomes.