Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Use of In vivo Imaging to Monitor the Progression of Experimental Mouse Cytomegalovirus Infection in Neonates
Published on: July 6, 2013
Cytomegalovirus in transplantation - challenging the status quo
Jay A Fishman1, Vincent Emery, Richard Freeman
1Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Background:
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients causes both ''direct'' and ''indirect'' effects including allograft rejection, decreased graft and patient survival, and predisposition to opportunistic infections and malignancies. Options for CMV prevention include pre-emptive therapy, whereby anti-CMV agents are administered based on sensitive viral assays, or universal prophylaxis of all at-risk patients. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages in terms of efficacy, costs, and side effects. Standards of care for prophylaxis have not been established.
Methods:
A committee of international experts was convened to review the available data regarding CMV prophylaxis and to compare preventative strategies for CMV after transplantation from seropositive donors or in seropositive recipients.
Results:
Pre-emptive therapy requires frequent monitoring with subsequent treatment of disease and associated costs, while universal prophylaxis results in greater exposure to potential toxicities and costs of drugs. The advantages of prophylaxis include suppressing asymptomatic viremia and prevention of both direct and indirect effects of CMV infection. Meta analyses reveal decreased in mortality for patients receiving CMV prophylaxis. Costs associated with prophylaxis are less than for routine monitoring and pre-emptive therapy. The optimal duration of antiviral prophylaxis remains undefined. Extended prophylaxis may improve clinical outcomes in the highest-risk patient populations including donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative renal transplants and in CMV-infected lung and heart transplantation.
Conclusions:
Prophylaxis is beneficial in preventing direct and indirect effects of CMV infection in transplant recipients, affecting both allograft and patient survival. More studies are necessary to define optimal prophylaxis regimens.
Insights
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients improves survival and prevents complications. Universal prophylaxis is more cost-effective than pre-emptive therapy, though optimal regimens require further study.
Area of Science:
- Transplant medicine
- Infectious diseases
- Virology
Background:
- Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection poses significant risks to solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, leading to direct and indirect effects like allograft rejection and reduced survival.
- Current CMV prevention strategies include pre-emptive therapy and universal prophylaxis, each with distinct efficacy, cost, and toxicity profiles.
- Established standards of care for CMV prophylaxis in SOT recipients are lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review available data on Cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis strategies in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients.
- To compare the efficacy, costs, and side effects of pre-emptive therapy versus universal prophylaxis for CMV infection.
- To inform the development of optimal CMV prophylaxis regimens for SOT patients.
Main Methods:
- A committee of international experts convened to analyze existing research on CMV prophylaxis.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing different CMV preventative strategies in SOT recipients.
- Evaluation of clinical outcomes, mortality rates, and economic factors associated with CMV prevention.
Main Results:
- Universal prophylaxis demonstrates advantages in suppressing asymptomatic viremia and preventing direct/indirect CMV effects, leading to decreased mortality.
- While pre-emptive therapy involves frequent monitoring and treatment costs, universal prophylaxis may incur higher drug toxicity and costs.
- Meta-analyses indicate that CMV prophylaxis is associated with reduced patient mortality and is more cost-effective than routine monitoring and pre-emptive therapy.
- Extended prophylaxis may benefit high-risk patient groups, including specific renal, lung, and heart transplant recipients.
Conclusions:
- CMV prophylaxis is crucial for improving allograft and patient survival in transplant recipients by mitigating direct and indirect CMV infection effects.
- Further research is essential to define optimal prophylaxis regimens, including duration and drug selection, for various SOT populations.
More Related Videos
11:18Expanding Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes from Umbilical Cord Blood that Target Cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr Virus, and Adenovirus
Published on: May 7, 2012
10:24Automated Cell Enrichment of Cytomegalovirus-specific T cells for Clinical Applications using the Cytokine-capture System
Published on: October 5, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Cytomegalovirus Disease
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...
Immunodeficiency Diseases
There are three main causes of immunodeficiency disorders...
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction