Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
Published on: August 1, 2017
Confabulation: motivated reality monitoring
Aikaterini Fotopoulou1, Martin A Conway, Mark Solms
1King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, UK. a.fotopoulou@iop.kcl.ac.uk
Abstract:
The study addressed the hypothesis that the content of confabulation is emotionally biased. Confabulating amnesic patients were compared with amnesic non-confabulating patients in a memory recognition experiment that manipulated the valence (pleasant, unpleasant), temporal source (past, present, future) and selection agent (self, other) of the to-be-recognised memories. The results revealed that confabulating patients were more likely than amnesic non-confabulating patients to incorrectly recognise past autobiographical events or thoughts as currently relevant memories, and this was more pronounced for pleasant compared to unpleasant events. These findings suggest that motivational factors, along with defective reality and temporality monitoring, contribute to confabulation.
Related Concept Videos
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Counterfactual Thinking
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness
Nonconscious Mimicry
Cognitive Dissonance
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring

