Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Culprit only versus complete coronary revascularization during primary PCI
Dahud Qarawani1, Menachem Nahir, Mouin Abboud
1Cardiovascular Department, Poria Medical Center, Israel.
Complete revascularization during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is safe and improves clinical outcomes. This approach reduces major cardiac events and shortens hospital stays compared to treating only the culprit artery.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Acute Myocardial Infarction Management
Background:
- Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is standard for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), typically targeting only the culprit artery.
- Limited data exist on simultaneous non-culprit vessel PCI during the primary procedure.
- This study investigates the safety and efficacy of complete revascularization in STEMI patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the hypothesis that complete revascularization during primary PCI for STEMI is safe.
- To assess if complete revascularization improves clinical outcomes during the indexed hospitalization.
- To compare complete revascularization (CR) versus culprit-only revascularization (COR) in STEMI patients.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study of 120 consecutive STEMI patients with multivessel coronary stenosis.
- Ninety-five patients underwent complete revascularization (CR), treating both culprit and significant non-culprit lesions.
- Twenty-five patients underwent culprit-only revascularization (COR), leaving non-culprit lesions untreated during primary PCI.
Main Results:
- Complete revascularization (CR) significantly reduced major adverse cardiac events (16.7% vs. 52%, P=0.0001), including recurrent ischemia, reinfarction, acute heart failure, and in-hospital mortality.
- CR group showed lower rates of recurrent ischemia (4.2% vs. 32%), reinfarction (3.1% vs. 16%), reintervention (7.3% vs. 32%), and acute heart failure (9.4% vs. 32%).
- Hospitalization was shorter in the CR group (4.4 vs. 9.6 days, P=0.001), though transient renal dysfunction was more frequent (8.4% vs. 4%). In-hospital and one-year mortality were similar.
Conclusions:
- Multivessel PCI during acute myocardial infarction is feasible and safe.
- Complete revascularization during primary PCI for STEMI leads to an improved acute clinical course.
- These findings support a strategy of complete revascularization in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
