Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Error propagation in calculated ratios.

Daniel T Holmes1, Kevin A Buhr

  • 1St. Paul's Hospital and the University of British Columbia Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver, BC, Canada. dtholmes@interchange.ubc.ca

Clinical Biochemistry
|April 17, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Seated Saline Suppression Test for Lateralizing Primary Aldosteronism.

Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)·2026
Same author

Interdisciplinary Collaboration to Develop a Custom Genomic Analysis Pipeline for the Clinical Laboratory: Hepatitis B Virus and Cytomegalovirus Antiviral Resistance Genotyping.

Clinical chemistry·2025
Same author

Robotic Process Automation in Laboratory Medicine.

Clinical chemistry·2025
Same author

Confirmatory Testing for Primary Aldosteronism : A Study of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.

Annals of internal medicine·2025
Same author

Migration from RIA to LC-MS/MS for aldosterone determination: Implications for clinical practice and determination of plasma and urine reference range intervals in a cohort of healthy Belgian subjects.

Clinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.)·2024
Same author

Testosterone Treatment and Fractures in Men with Hypogonadism.

The New England journal of medicine·2024
Same journal

Evaluation of hemoglobin interference thresholds for chemical urinalysis panels.

Clinical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Integrated genomic and biochemical diagnosis of a novel homozygous start-loss variant in AKR1D1 associated with neonatal cholestasis.

Clinical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Agreement between POC glucose meters and blood gas analyzers varies across ICU patient populations.

Clinical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

From variability to value: Advancing vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring toward decision-grade practice through commutability-informed external quality assessment and uncertainty-aware reporting.

Clinical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Response to the letter to the editor: From variability to value: Advancing vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring toward decision-grade practice through commutability-informed external quality assessment and uncertainty-aware reporting.

Clinical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

What are the correlates of laboratory productivity in clinical laboratories in the Asia Pacific region?

Clinical biochemistry·2026
See all related articles

A new formula accurately estimates random analytical error in calculated laboratory test ratios, crucial for reliable medical screening and patient care. This improved method is more precise than common formulas, especially with higher variability in test results.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Calculated quantities, often ratios of laboratory tests, are widely used in medical screening, risk evaluation, and patient monitoring.
  • Propagated random analytical error in these calculated ratios is a significant, yet often underestimated, issue in clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate an approximate formula for estimating the mean, standard deviation (SD), and coefficient of variation (CV) of a ratio of two independent, normally distributed random variables.
  • To compare the accuracy of the proposed formula with the commonly used formula for the CV of a ratio.

Main Methods:

  • Applied standard error propagation theory to derive formulas for the statistical properties of a ratio.
  • Utilized random simulations to mathematically model and validate the derived formulas.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared the proposed formula's performance against the established formula for the CV of a ratio.

    • Main Results:

    • The novel approximation formula for the CV of a ratio (R=X/Y) demonstrated an absolute percentage error of less than 4% for denominators with CVs under 20%.
    • The commonly quoted formula exhibited a higher percentage error, up to 16%, under the same conditions (denominator CVs < 20%).

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed formula offers superior accuracy for calculated ratios, particularly when the denominator's CV exceeds 10%, compared to the traditional formula.
    • Clinicians and laboratorians should be aware of potentially significant random analytical error in calculated ratios, especially near medical decision limits, to avoid misinterpretations.