Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

10:48
PET and MRI Guided Irradiation of a Glioblastoma Rat Model Using a Micro-irradiator
Published on: December 28, 2017
CT-guided intervention with low radiation dose: feasibility and experience
Brian C Lucey1, Jose C Varghese, Aaron Hochberg
1Department of Radiology, Division of Body Imaging, Boston University Medical Center, 88 E Newton St., Atrium 2, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
|April 24, 2007
Summary
This study shows that a low-radiation dose technique using 30 mAs is feasible for CT-guided procedures. It achieves success rates comparable to standard doses for biopsies and drainage, minimizing patient radiation exposure.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Interventional Radiology
- Radiation Oncology
Background:
- Minimizing radiation dose in computed tomography (CT)-guided procedures is crucial for patient safety.
- Standard radiation doses may pose risks, necessitating the exploration of low-dose alternatives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a very low radiation dose technique for CT-guided interventional procedures.
- To compare the success rates of low-dose CT-guided procedures with those performed at standard radiation doses.
Main Methods:
- 291 CT-guided procedures (201 biopsies, 90 drainage) were performed using a reduced milliamperesecond (mAs) technique after initial standard dose imaging.
- CT fluoroscopy was not utilized; subsequent scans were at a reduced mAs.
- Technical success rates were compared to historical data from standard radiation doses, with patient weight and lesion size recorded.
Main Results:
- A 96.7% success rate was achieved for aspiration or drainage procedures at 30 mAs.
- The technical success rate for percutaneous biopsy at 30 mAs was 93.5%.
- Low-dose technique success rates were comparable to standard doses, with similar complication rates.
Conclusions:
- A low-dose radiation technique (30 mAs) is effective for CT-guided percutaneous biopsies and drainage.
- This technique offers comparable technical success to standard radiation doses while reducing patient exposure.
- Feasibility is demonstrated for routine use in interventional radiology settings.
