Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multivariate normative comparisons.

Hilde M Huizenga1, Harriet Smeding, Raoul P P P Grasman

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Roeterstraat 15, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. h.m.huizenga@uva.nl

Neuropsychologia
|April 25, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A reciprocal model of practice and skill: Navigating between dropout and expertise.

Psychological review·2026
Same author

Adolescents' Strategies to Manage Mental Health Challenges In and After the Pandemic: Two Mixed-Methods Studies.

Research on child and adolescent psychopathology·2026
Same author

Dialectical Behavior Therapy vs Schema Therapy for Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder: The BOOTS Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA psychiatry·2026
Same author

Investigating Neural Reward Sensitivity in the School Grade Incentive Delay Task and Its Relation to Academic Buoyancy.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Amsterdam Self-Efficacy Scale for Tooth Removal (ASES-TR).

European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe·2025
Same author

Usefulness of Cross-Lagged Panel Models for Clinical Research.

Chest·2025
Same journal

Prevalence and modulation of rat off-track head scanning on linear tracks: possible implications for representational and dynamic properties of hippocampal place cells.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Identifying networks within an fMRI multivariate searchlight analysis.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Modulating sentence comprehension in people with aphasia through anodal tDCS: A double-blind randomized cross-over study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Deficient processing of regularity violations during visuospatial neglect: a visual mismatch negativity study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Seeing is believing: mental imagery amplifies moral, emotional, and motivational responding to mentally constructed hypothetical events.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

From past recall to future projection: What does verb tense production reveal about mental time travel in Alzheimer's disease?

Neuropsychologia·2026
See all related articles

This study compares statistical methods for neuropsychological evaluations. Both Bonferroni corrected univariate and multivariate comparisons control Type I errors, with multivariate analysis offering higher power in larger samples.

Area of Science:

  • Neuropsychology
  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Research

Background:

  • Neuropsychological evaluations often involve multiple tests to assess various patient characteristics.
  • Analyzing each characteristic separately increases the risk of false positive decisions (Type I errors).
  • Multivariate statistical analysis is crucial for accurate normative comparisons in such cases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate two statistical approaches for multivariate normative comparisons in neuropsychology.
  • To compare Bonferroni corrected univariate comparisons with a multivariate comparison method.
  • To assess Type I error control and statistical power for both methods across different sample sizes.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed two methods: Bonferroni corrected univariate comparisons and a multivariate comparison.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate Type I error rates and statistical power.
  • Tested both unidirectional (two-sided) and directional (one-sided) hypotheses.

    • Main Results:

    • Both approaches demonstrated correct Type I error control, even with small sample sizes.
    • The univariate approach showed higher power when the normative sample size was very small.
    • The multivariate comparison generally exhibited increased power in larger sample sizes.

    Conclusions:

    • Both Bonferroni corrected univariate and multivariate comparisons are statistically sound for neuropsychological normative data.
    • The choice of method depends on sample size, with multivariate analysis being more powerful for larger datasets.
    • These methods aid in accurately detecting patient deviations from norms, as illustrated in a Parkinson's disease cognitive side effect study.