Related Experiment Videos
Penile carcinoma: a twenty-five-year experience
M J Young1, D J Reda, W B Waters
1Section of Urology, Hines VA Hospital, Illinois.
Urology
|December 1, 1991
Summary
Penile cancer treatment outcomes were reviewed for 34 patients. Stage I penile cancer patients treated with surgery and observation showed similar survival to those with lymphadenectomy.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Urology
Background:
- Carcinoma of the penis is a rare malignancy.
- Treatment strategies for penile cancer have evolved over time.
- Long-term outcomes for different treatment approaches require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review treatment outcomes for penile cancer patients over a 25-year period.
- To evaluate the impact of ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy on survival in Stage I penile cancer.
- To present a management plan for primary penile lesions and lymph node assessment.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 34 patients with penile carcinoma treated between 1958 and 1983.
- Analysis of treatment modalities including partial/total penectomy and immediate ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy versus observation.
- Survival analysis using Mantel-Cox and Breslow tests.
Main Results:
- Stage I penile cancer patients treated with surgery and observation had survival rates not significantly different from those undergoing immediate lymphadenectomy.
- All Stage II penile cancer patients (7) died, with a mean survival of 10.6 months, significantly lower than Stage I.
- Stage II survival was significantly poorer compared to literature reports.
Conclusions:
- For Stage I penile cancer with clinically nonpalpable nodes, partial/total penectomy with observation may yield similar survival to immediate ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy.
- Stage II penile cancer has a poor prognosis, necessitating aggressive management strategies.
- A clear management plan for primary penile lesions and lymph node status is crucial.