Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Modeling Encephalopathy of Prematurity Using Prenatal Hypoxia-ischemia with Intra-amniotic Lipopolysaccharide in Rats
Published on: November 20, 2015
[Intensive care at extremely low gestational age: ethical issues and treatment choices]
M S Pignotti1, M Toraldo di Francia, G Donzelli
1Neonatal Medicine, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, Firenze. m.pignotti@meyer.it
Insights
Advances in neonatal care push the limits of human viability. Ethical decisions are crucial for infants born between 22-25 weeks gestational age, balancing benefits and risks of intensive care.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Medical Ethics
- Perinatology
Background:
- Neonatal intensive care advancements have lowered the gestational age threshold for infant viability.
- Infants born between 22-25 weeks gestational age (GA) have low survival and high disability rates.
- Pulmonary physiological development around 23-24 weeks GA is a critical factor in determining viability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the ethical considerations in providing intensive care for extremely premature infants.
- To explore the complexities of medical, social, and economic factors influencing treatment decisions.
- To examine the ethical basis for decisions regarding treatment, non-treatment, and withdrawal of care.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of ethical frameworks and guidelines.
- Analysis of decision-making processes for extremely premature infants.
- Discussion of the concept of "infant's best interest" in neonatal care.
Main Results:
- Decisions for infants at the threshold of viability involve unclear benefit-risk ratios.
- There is growing concern within the scientific community regarding the ethics of intensive neonatal care.
- Defining the "best interest" of the infant remains a significant challenge.
Conclusions:
- Care for infants born at 22-25 weeks GA necessitates careful ethical deliberation.
- Decisions involve balancing potential benefits against burdens of intensive care.
- Ethical frameworks are essential for guiding decisions on initiating, continuing, or withdrawing treatment.
Abstract:
With the continuing progress of obstetrical and neonatal care, the limit of human viability has continued to shift towards younger gestational ages. The survival rate as well as the survival without disability increases with each additional week of gestation but, for infants born from 22 to 25 w GA, it is still really low, and the threshold of human viability appears to be limited to the physiological development of the lungs, which take place around the 23rd-24th w GA. At present, the care of such infants, born at the threshold of human viability, presents a variety of complex medical, social, and economical decisions assuming the characteristics of ethical decisions in that the limits between benefits and disadvantages is not so clearcut. What is the true infant's best interest is far to be understood and concern about the ethical basis of providing such intensive care is arising in the scientific community. In this paper the authors provide a review of the ethical basis of decisions related to the care of such infants: to treat, not to treat, intensive or compassionate care, withhold or withdraw treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...

