Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Continuous renal replacement in critical illness.

Claudio Ronco1, Dinna Cruz, Rinaldo Bellomo

  • 1Department of Nephrology, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy. cronco@goldnet.it

Contributions to Nephrology
|April 28, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hepatorenal syndrome treated for eight months with continuous-flow peritoneal dialysis.

Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Conference on Peritoneal Dialysis·2013
Same author

Year in review 2012: Critical Care--Nephrology.

Critical care (London, England)·2013
Same author

Healthcare systems and chronic kidney disease: putting the patient in control.

Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association·2013
Same author

Neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin in acute kidney injury.

Postgraduate medicine·2013
Same author

Ultrafiltration therapy for acute decompensated heart failure: lessons learned from 2 major trials.

American heart journal·2013
Same author

Potential use of biomarkers in acute kidney injury: report and summary of recommendations from the 10th Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative consensus conference.

Kidney international·2013
Same journal

Adsorption of Pathogens and Blockade of Sepsis Cascade.

Contributions to nephrology·2023
Same journal

Hemoadsorption: Research Agenda and Potential Future Applications.

Contributions to nephrology·2023
Same journal

Hemoperfusion in Poisoning and Drug Overdose.

Contributions to nephrology·2023
Same journal

Hemoperfusion in Burns.

Contributions to nephrology·2023
Same journal

Sequential Extracorporeal Therapy in Sepsis.

Contributions to nephrology·2023
Same journal

The Use of Adsorption in Extracorporeal Liver Support: The Double Plasma Molecular Adsorption System (DPMAS).

Contributions to nephrology·2023
See all related articles

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) offers physiological benefits over intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) for acute renal failure in intensive care units. However, recent studies show limited evidence of improved survival or major clinical outcomes with CRRT compared to IHD.

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Management

Background:

  • Acute renal failure (ARF) in the ICU is often part of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, with increasing patient complexity.
  • Conventional intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) presents limitations for critically ill patients, including hemodynamic intolerance and inefficiency.
  • Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was developed to address IHD's shortcomings in treating ICU patients with ARF.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent clinical trials comparing CRRT and IHD in the ICU setting.
  • To evaluate whether CRRT's physiological superiority translates into improved clinical outcomes.
  • To discuss the results and limitations of current comparative studies.

Main Methods:

  • Review of recent randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing CRRT and IHD.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of studies investigating survival and major clinical outcomes in ICU patients with ARF.
  • Consideration of emerging hybrid dialysis techniques.

    • Main Results:

    • Despite physiological advantages, current evidence does not strongly support improved survival with CRRT over IHD.
    • Recent studies comparing CRRT and IHD have often been underpowered.
    • Interpretation of results is complicated by study design and evolving treatment modalities like slow extended daily dialysis.

    Conclusions:

    • The clinical benefit of CRRT over IHD in terms of survival and major outcomes remains uncertain.
    • Further well-powered studies are needed to definitively compare CRRT and IHD in critically ill patients.
    • The dynamic nature of renal replacement therapies requires ongoing evaluation of comparative evidence.