Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Synchrony effects in automatic and controlled retrieval.

Lixia Yang1, Lynn Hasher, Daryl E Wilson

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. lixiay@ryerson.ca

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|May 1, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Wuzi Yanzong Pill improves Parkinson's disease via miR-146a-5p/USP3/NF-κB axis.

Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology·2026
Same author

Association Between Comprehensive Health Assessment and Cardiac Mortality and All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease.

Clinical cardiology·2026
Same author

Whole-genome sequencing and analysis of the endophytic fungus Alternaria alternata Y-2 from Leymus chinensis.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Vitamin D receptor regulate placental ABCB1 expression transcriptionally by recruiting coactivator SRC-1.

Pharmacogenetics and genomics·2026
Same author

Enhanced Condensation of RNA Repeats Induced by Terahertz Oscillatory Fields.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Research on anti-turbulence methods for vortex beam communication based on FSRA-ConvNet and SFHformer.

Optics express·2026
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

This study found that controlled memory retrieval is strongest in the morning for morning-type individuals, while automatic retrieval shows no time-of-day effect. These findings highlight daily rhythms in cognitive processes.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Chronobiology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Cognitive performance, including memory retrieval, can fluctuate throughout the day.
  • Understanding time-of-day effects is crucial for optimizing learning and task performance.
  • Automatic and controlled cognitive processes may be differentially affected by circadian rhythms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of time of day on automatic and controlled memory retrieval processes.
  • To examine whether morning-type individuals exhibit different retrieval performance at peak (morning) versus off-peak (afternoon) times.
  • To differentiate the temporal dynamics of automatic versus controlled memory retrieval.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a speeded retrieval procedure with implicit and explicit stem completion tasks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Tested morning-type adults at their peak (early morning) and off-peak (late afternoon) times.
  • Differentiated retrieval strategies based on response speed changes between practice and test phases.

    • Main Results:

    • Controlled retrieval performance (indicated by slower response times) showed significantly more priming at peak times compared to off-peak times.
    • Automatic retrieval performance (indicated by consistent response times) did not differ between peak and off-peak times.
    • The observed time-of-day effect was robust for controlled retrieval but absent for automatic retrieval.

    Conclusions:

    • Controlled memory retrieval demonstrates a synchrony effect, aligning with daily circadian rhythms.
    • Automatic memory retrieval appears to be independent of time-of-day variations.
    • These findings suggest that the efficiency of effortful cognitive control in memory is subject to daily fluctuations.