Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Single-trial EEG dynamics of object and face visual processing.

Guillaume A Rousselet1, Jesse S Husk, Patrick J Bennett

  • 1McMaster University, Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4K1. g.rousselet@psy.gla.ac.uk

Neuroimage
|May 4, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Post COVID-19 condition is associated with altered regional cerebral blood volume as revealed by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.

Frontiers in neuroimaging·2026
Same author

Using Simulations to Explore Sampling Distributions: An Antidote to Hasty and Extravagant Inferences.

eNeuro·2025
Same author

The effects of aging on directionally selective masking.

Journal of vision·2025
Same author

Can prediction error explain predictability effects on the N1 during picture-word verification?

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Bias in data-driven replicability analysis of univariate brain-wide association studies.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Spontaneous blinking and brain health in aging: Large-scale evaluation of blink-related oscillations across the lifespan.

Frontiers in aging neuroscience·2025
Same journal

Spatial frequency channels implement a mental ruler in spatial vision.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Exploring the Link Between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Measured Brain Diffusivity During Wakefulness and Sleep Macrostructure in the Elderly.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Closed-loop adaptation of transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity with electroencephalography feedback.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Volumetric postmortem MRI of the medial temporal lobe in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders: methodological advances and implications for in vivo biomarker development.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Neural responses to equity and inequity when receiving vicarious rewards for self and charity during adolescence.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Cognitive Strategy-based neuromodulation optimizes neural communication to improve working memory.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

Early visual object processing is primarily driven by amplitude increases in the 5-15 Hz frequency band, not phase resetting of ongoing brain activity. This explains the enhanced response to faces.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) traditionally analyze mean amplitude differences for visual object processing.
  • Recent theories propose phase resetting of ongoing neural activity explains ERP components.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate the role of phase resetting versus amplitude modulation in visual object processing.
  • Examine single-trial EEG dynamics for noise textures, houses, and faces.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of single-trial EEG signal dynamics.
  • Examination of neural processing in the 5-15 Hz frequency band.
  • Simulation of evoked ERP models.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Brain responses are best explained by amplitude increases in the 5-15 Hz band.
  • Observed phase coherence increases result from ERP presence, not phase resetting.
  • The N170 face effect correlates with amplitude modulation in the 5-15 Hz band.

    • Conclusions:

    • Visual object processing relies on amplitude modulation, not phase resetting.
    • The N170 face effect can be attributed to amplitude modulation.
    • A purely evoked model quantitatively explains ERP findings.