Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modern injection augmentation for glottic insufficiency.

J Michael King1, C Blake Simpson

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas 78229, USA.

Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery
|May 8, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessment of Enteral Baclofen Prescribing Practices for Infants With Hypertonia.

The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG·2026
Same author

Office-Based Procedures for Chronic Cough.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Diagnosis and Treatment of Refractory Chronic Cough: An American Broncho-Esophagological Association Expert Consensus Statement.

The Laryngoscope·2026
Same author

Autoimmune Disorders Affecting the Larynx: Review of Laryngoscopic Findings and Approach to Multidisciplinary Management.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
Same author

Nebulized Lidocaine Through a Channeled Endoscope for Office Laryngology Procedures.

The Laryngoscope·2025
Same author

Factors Directing Treatment Decision-Making in the Management of Glottic Insufficiency.

The Laryngoscope·2025
Same journal

Advances in patient-specific 3D-printed models in temporal bone surgery.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Graduated autonomy in head and neck microvascular surgery fellowship training: oncologic and reconstructive competency, safety, and educational implications.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Costs and system-wide considerations within head and neck reconstruction: moving toward a value-based care framework.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Modern methods of dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Flap selection for circumferential pharyngeal reconstruction.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Improving facial scar outcomes: an evidence-based update.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
See all related articles

Technological advancements have improved vocal fold injection augmentation materials. Understanding the pros and cons of short-term and long-term options helps optimize patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Regenerative Medicine

Background:

  • Recent technological advancements have revitalized interest in vocal fold injection augmentation.
  • Injectable materials are crucial for restoring voice function and quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the characteristics of current short-term and long-term vocal fold injection materials.
  • To discuss the advantages and disadvantages of available injectable substances for vocal fold augmentation.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of recent advancements in vocal fold injection materials.
  • Analysis of injectable substances originally developed for dermatologic applications.

Main Results:

  • Newer injectable materials, often adapted from dermal fillers, have improved clinical outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Current substances increasingly mimic the natural viscoelastic properties of the vocal folds.
  • The ideal vocal fold injection material remains an active area of research.

    • Conclusions:

    • A diverse range of injectable materials presents both opportunities and challenges for clinicians.
    • Selecting the optimal temporary or long-term injectable material requires careful consideration of patient-specific needs.
    • Surgeons can enhance patient outcomes by understanding the benefits and drawbacks of each available option.