Self-expanding stents for recanalization of acute cerebrovascular occlusions

E I Levy1, R Mehta, R Gupta

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, University at Buffalo, Kaleida Health/Millard Gates Hospital, Buffalo,NY 14209, USA. elevy@buffns.com

Insights

Self-expanding intracranial stents show feasibility for acute stroke treatment, achieving high recanalization rates, especially for single-vessel occlusions. This method offers improved outcomes, particularly in women.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroendovascular therapy
  • Interventional neurology
  • Cerebrovascular disease management

Background:

  • Stent-assisted revascularization improves recanalization rates for difficult vessel occlusions.
  • Intracranial self-expanding stents offer enhanced flexibility and safety compared to balloon-mounted stents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of self-expanding stents for recanalizing acute cerebrovascular occlusions.
  • To assess preliminary outcomes of using self-expanding stents in stroke patients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 18 patients (19 lesions) with acute intracranial artery occlusions.
  • Deployment of self-expanding stents, with or without prior pharmacologic/mechanical interventions.
  • Administration of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in 10 cases to prevent in-stent thrombosis.

Main Results:

  • Technical success (stent deployment) achieved in all cases.
  • Angiographic success (TICI/TIMI 2/3 recanalization) in 79% of lesions (15/19).
  • Higher recanalization rates for single-vessel lesions (8/8) compared to complex lesions (7/11).
  • No intraprocedural complications; 7 in-hospital deaths.
  • Significant clinical improvement (NIHSS, mRS) observed in some patients, with a trend favoring women.

Conclusions:

  • Self-expanding stents are feasible for treating acute symptomatic intracranial occlusions.
  • Stent placement with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors achieved high recanalization rates, particularly for single-vessel lesions.
  • Outcomes suggest potential for improved revascularization and clinical results compared to other thrombolytic methods.
Abstract