Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ebola Virus Disease Diagnostics, Sierra Leone: Analysis of Real-time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Values for Clinical Blood and Oral Swab Specimens.

The Journal of infectious diseases·2016
Same author

Prognostic Indicators for Ebola Patient Survival.

Emerging infectious diseases·2016
Same author

Ebola Virus Diagnostics: The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Laboratory in Sierra Leone, August 2014 to March 2015.

The Journal of infectious diseases·2015
Same author

Ebola Virus Epidemiology, Transmission, and Evolution during Seven Months in Sierra Leone.

Cell·2015
Same author

Cerebral hemodynamic compromise associated with limb shaking TIA and focal EEG slowing.

American journal of electroneurodiagnostic technology·2009
Same author

Real-time differentiation of nonconvulsive status epilepticus from other encephalopathies using quantitative EEG analysis: a pilot study.

Epilepsia·2009

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Equipment Setup and Artifact Removal for Simultaneous Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Review in Epilepsy
10:23

Equipment Setup and Artifact Removal for Simultaneous Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Review in Epilepsy

Published on: June 23, 2023

EEG reviewing/recording strategy.

Scott Bearden1

  • 1Department of Neurology, Clinical Neurophysiology Lab, North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Hospital Gainesville, Florida 32608, USA.

American Journal of Electroneurodiagnostic Technology
|May 17, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Optimizing electroencephalogram (EEG) display during recording and review is crucial for accurate waveform detection. Proper adjustments minimize missed abnormalities caused by artifacts, ensuring reliable EEG interpretation.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medical Technology
  • Clinical Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Accurate electroencephalogram (EEG) interpretation relies on precise waveform detection and characterization.
  • Digital EEG recording can lead to complacency, potentially causing subtle abnormalities to be missed during initial review.
  • Artifacts such as muscle activity, low gain, EKG, and poor montage selection can mask important EEG findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To emphasize the importance of optimizing EEG display parameters during recording and initial review.
  • To provide guidance on minimizing detection errors in EEG interpretation.
  • To discuss how specific instrumentation adjustments can improve the visibility of EEG waveforms and abnormalities.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of display parameters adjustable during EEG acquisition and review, including montage selection, filtering, sensitivity, and page duration.

More Related Videos

Investigating the Function of Deep Cortical and Subcortical Structures Using Stereotactic Electroencephalography: Lessons from the Anterior Cingulate Cortex
09:00

Investigating the Function of Deep Cortical and Subcortical Structures Using Stereotactic Electroencephalography: Lessons from the Anterior Cingulate Cortex

Published on: April 15, 2015

Recording Human Electrocorticographic (ECoG) Signals for Neuroscientific Research and Real-time Functional Cortical Mapping
13:32

Recording Human Electrocorticographic (ECoG) Signals for Neuroscientific Research and Real-time Functional Cortical Mapping

Published on: June 26, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Equipment Setup and Artifact Removal for Simultaneous Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Review in Epilepsy
10:23

Equipment Setup and Artifact Removal for Simultaneous Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Review in Epilepsy

Published on: June 23, 2023

Investigating the Function of Deep Cortical and Subcortical Structures Using Stereotactic Electroencephalography: Lessons from the Anterior Cingulate Cortex
09:00

Investigating the Function of Deep Cortical and Subcortical Structures Using Stereotactic Electroencephalography: Lessons from the Anterior Cingulate Cortex

Published on: April 15, 2015

Recording Human Electrocorticographic (ECoG) Signals for Neuroscientific Research and Real-time Functional Cortical Mapping
13:32

Recording Human Electrocorticographic (ECoG) Signals for Neuroscientific Research and Real-time Functional Cortical Mapping

Published on: June 26, 2012

  • Explanation of how these instrumentation changes affect EEG appearance.
  • Inclusion of examples to illustrate the impact of parameter adjustments.

    • Main Results:

    • Optimizing EEG display parameters during initial review can significantly reduce detection errors.
    • Technologists using optimal recording techniques can better highlight EEG irregularities.
    • Quick adjustments to montage, filtering, sensitivity, and display duration are key to improving EEG clarity.

    Conclusions:

    • Reviewers must optimize EEG appearance during initial review to avoid missing subtle abnormalities.
    • EEG technologists play a vital role in reducing detection errors through optimal recording practices.
    • Understanding and applying adjustments to display parameters are essential for accurate and efficient EEG interpretation.