Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mismatch negativity reflects sensory and phonetic speech processing.

Marc F Joanisse1, Erin K Robertson, Randy Lynn Newman

  • 1Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. marcj@uwo.ca

Neuroreport
|May 23, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Audiovisual integration in reading among school-aged children: Evidence from combined fMRI and EEG.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Crossroads in the Learning Brain: The Neural Overlap Between Arithmetic and Phonological Processing.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same author

Beta-band modulation reveals the cortical dynamics of auditory statistical learning in children.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2025
Same author

Patterns of the left thalamus embedding into the connectome associated with reading skills in children with reading disabilities.

Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2024
Same author

Multivariate Pattern Analysis of EEG Reveals Neural Mechanism of Naturalistic Target Processing in Attentional Blink.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2024
Same author

Control energy detects discrepancies in good vs. poor readers' structural-functional coupling during a rhyming task.

NeuroImage·2024

This study shows that sensory factors, not just phonetic categories, influence speech perception. Mismatch negativity (MMN) responses were stronger for acoustically distinct speech sounds, even when they belonged to the same category.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Auditory Perception

Background:

  • Speech perception involves complex phonetic and sensory processing.
  • Mismatch negativity (MMN) is an electrophysiological measure sensitive to auditory change detection, even for unattended stimuli.
  • The relationship between acoustic properties and phonetic categorization in MMN is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of sensory factors on speech perception using MMN.
  • To determine if acoustic differences impact MMN responses independently of phonetic category membership.
  • To explore the role of sensory-driven processes in unattended speech perception.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized event-related potentials (ERPs) to measure brain responses.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed a passive auditory oddball paradigm with adult listeners (N=16).
  • Presented repeated standard syllables ('da') with infrequent 'deviant' syllables ('ba') varying in acoustic strength (Strong vs. Weak).

    • Main Results:

    • Significantly larger mismatch negativities (MMNs) were elicited by Strong deviants compared to Weak deviants.
    • This difference was observed despite both deviant types belonging to the same stable phonetic category.
    • MMN amplitude was modulated by acoustic stimulus properties beyond categorical perception.

    Conclusions:

    • Sensory factors, such as acoustic intensity, play a significant role in modulating mismatch negativity during speech perception.
    • MMN reflects sensory processing that can exceed the demands of overt phonetic categorization and discrimination.
    • These findings highlight the contribution of low-level acoustic processing to unattended speech perception.