Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
Published on: July 31, 2017
What is to be done? Children's ascriptions of conventional obligations
Charles W Kalish1, Rebecca Cornelius
1University of Wisconsin--Madison, WI 53706, USA. cwkalish@wisc.edu
Insights
Children and adults understand that obligations can conflict with personal benefits. Young children sometimes link obligations to authority figures
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Development
- Moral Psychology
- Social Cognition
Background:
- Determining what one ought to do is complex.
- Understanding conventional obligations is crucial for social functioning.
- Previous research has not fully elucidated the developmental trajectory of obligation understanding.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the cues children and adults use to identify conventional obligations.
- To explore developmental differences in understanding the relationship between obligations, outcomes, and mental states.
Main Methods:
- Three experiments were conducted with preschool-aged (4-5 years), school-aged (7-8 years), and adult participants.
- Participants were presented with scenarios to assess their understanding of obligations in relation to expected outcomes, costs, benefits, awareness, and authority figures' desires.
Main Results:
- While young children often expect consistency, all age groups recognized that obligations can conflict with personal costs and benefits.
- Participants across all ages understood that individuals may have obligations they are unaware of.
- Preschoolers, unlike older children, frequently linked obligations to the desires of authority figures.
Conclusions:
- Understanding of conventional obligations develops throughout childhood, with increasing nuance regarding their potential conflict with personal interests.
- Early understanding of obligations is influenced by perceived authority, while later development incorporates a more complex interplay of mental states and outcomes.
- These findings shed light on the development of social cognition and moral reasoning.
Abstract:
It is often not apparent what people ought to do. Three experiments explored cues that children and adults may use to identify conventional obligations. Experiment 1 addressed the hypothesis that young children identify obligations with expected outcomes. Although preschool-aged (4-5 years) children often expected consistency, they and school-aged (7-8 years) and adult participants indicated that obligations may be at odds with costs and benefits. In Experiment 2, all participants realized that people may have obligations they are unaware of. Preschool-aged children often used information about obligations to identify characters' beliefs. In Experiment 3, preschool but not school-aged children reliably identified obligations with the desires of authorities. The results are discussed in terms of expectations about canonical relations between mental states, outcomes, and obligations.
Related Concept Videos
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal consequences. In Stage...
Conduct Disorder
Obedience
Relationship with Other Adult Family Members and Siblings
Social Foundations of Self I: Play and Game

