Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Outer-Boundary Assisted Segmentation and Quantification of Trabecular Bones by an Imagej Plugin
Published on: March 14, 2018
Analysis of trabecular bone structure with multidetector spiral computed tomography in a simulated soft-tissue
Jan S Bauer1, Thomas M Link, Andrew Burghardt
1Musculoskeletal and Quantitative Imaging Research, Department of Radiology, University of California in San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. jsb@roe.med.tum.de
High-resolution computed tomography can visualize trabecular bone structure, even with surrounding soft tissue. While image quality is reduced by soft tissue scatter, key bone characteristics remain quantifiable.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Biomedical Imaging
- Orthopedic Research
Background:
- Assessing trabecular bone structure is crucial for understanding bone health and disease.
- High-resolution multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) offers potential for in vivo bone analysis.
- The influence of surrounding soft tissue (ST) on MDCT image quality and bone quantification is not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of surrounding soft tissue on image quality using high-resolution MDCT.
- To evaluate the effect of simulated surrounding soft tissue on the quantification of trabecular bone structure.
- To compare MDCT results with micro-computed tomography (microCT) as a gold standard.
Main Methods:
- Eight human proximal femoral bone cores were scanned using microCT and MDCT.
- MDCT scans were performed both with and without simulated surrounding soft tissue (phantom).
- Image quality metrics (SNR, CNR) and trabecular bone structure parameters were analyzed and compared to microCT.
Main Results:
- MDCT overestimated trabecular structure parameters compared to microCT, both with and without surrounding ST.
- Image quality (SNR, CNR) was significantly higher in scans without surrounding ST.
- Significant correlations were found between microCT and MDCT for bone fraction, trabecular number, and separation.
- Root-mean-square errors ranged from 10-17%, with only bone fraction showing significant differences with and without ST.
Conclusions:
- High-resolution MDCT can visualize and quantify trabecular bone structure in an in vivo-like setting, including at proximal femur sites.
- Surrounding soft tissue significantly compromises image quality due to scatter but does not prevent appreciation of major trabecular network characteristics.
- MDCT shows promise for in vivo assessment of trabecular bone, despite the challenges posed by soft tissue attenuation.
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Electron Microscope Tomography and Single-particle Reconstruction
Electron Tomography
Electron tomography can be performed either in TEM or STEM (scanning transmission...

