Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...

Instrument Calibration

Instrument Calibration

Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the other increases, and...

Residuals and Least-Squares Property

Residuals and Least-Squares Property

The vertical distance between the actual value of y and the estimated value of y. In other words, it measures the vertical distance between the actual data point and the predicted point on the line
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...

Glassware Calibration

Glassware Calibration

Accurate calibration of glassware, such as volumetric flasks, pipettes, and burettes, is essential to ensure accurate measurements in the analytical laboratory. Calibration helps maintain consistency across measurements and prevents errors arising from inaccurate volumes.
Volumetric flasks: Volumetric flasks are designed to prepare aqueous solutions of precise volumes accurately with a calibration line on the neck. To calibrate a volumetric flask, it is important to fill it with distilled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

How Not to Do WLS Fitting in Calibration with Heteroscedastic Data.

Analytical chemistry·2026

Same author

Systematic errors in isothermal titration calorimetry: The role of feedback power and effects of mixing and diffusion on concentrations.

Analytical biochemistry·2025

Same author

Calibrating ITC instruments: Problems with weak base neutralization.

Analytical biochemistry·2024

Same author

Goodness-of-Fit Tests in Calibration: Are They Any Good for Selecting Least-Squares Weighting Formulas?

Analytical chemistry·2022

Same author

A (partial) resolution of binding enthalpy discrepancies in ITC studies of Ba<sup>2+</sup> crown ether complexation: The importance of calibration.

Analytical biochemistry·2021

Same author

Estimating Real-Time qPCR Amplification Efficiency from Single-Reaction Data.

Life (Basel, Switzerland)·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

Weighted least-squares in calibration: what difference does it make?

Joel Tellinghuisen¹

¹Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.

|May 26, 2007

Summary

Accurate weighting in univariate calibration is crucial for precise estimation of unknown concentrations. Incorrect weighting significantly reduces precision, especially at low concentrations, while proper methods improve results.

Area of Science:

Analytical Chemistry
Chemometrics
Statistical Modeling

Background:

Univariate calibration estimates unknown concentrations from measured responses using a calibration dataset.
Least-squares (LS) fitting is commonly used, but optimal precision requires weighting data inversely to their true variances.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the impact of incorrect weighting on calibration parameter precision and unknown concentration estimation.
To evaluate the performance of different weighting strategies, including neglecting weights, using replicates, and variance function estimation.

Main Methods:

Monte Carlo simulations were employed to study the effects of weighting on precision and standard errors.
Analysis included scenarios with heteroscedasticity, specifically proportional error (sigma proportional to y).

More Related Videos

Medical-grade Sterilizable Target for Fluid-immersed Fetoscope Optical Distortion Calibration

Medical-grade Sterilizable Target for Fluid-immersed Fetoscope Optical Distortion Calibration

Published on: February 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

Medical-grade Sterilizable Target for Fluid-immersed Fetoscope Optical Distortion Calibration

Medical-grade Sterilizable Target for Fluid-immersed Fetoscope Optical Distortion Calibration

Published on: February 23, 2017

A relative error test was used to assess weighting predispositions.

Main Results:

Neglecting weights in the presence of proportional error can lead to an order of magnitude loss in precision for low concentrations.
Using replicates improves precision at low concentrations but can be less effective than unweighted regression at higher concentrations.
Variance function estimation approximates minimum-variance weighting, and a relative error test can show a predisposition towards specific weighting schemes.

Conclusions:

Correct weighting is essential for accurate and precise univariate calibration, particularly in the low concentration range.
The choice of weighting strategy significantly impacts the reliability of estimated concentrations and associated uncertainties.
A priori assessment of parameters allows for reliable weighting and robust statistical analysis, including chi-squared tests and normal distribution confidence limits.