Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Memories of real-life decisions
Ola Svenson1, Ilkka Salo, Kirsten van de Loo
1Risk Analysis and Decision Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, S - 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. osn@psychology.su.se
Decision makers recall important life choices using both abstract and emotional characteristics, challenging traditional decision theories. Findings suggest memory representations are complex and individual-specific.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Decision Science
- Memory Studies
Background:
- Understanding how individuals mentally represent significant life decisions is crucial for refining decision-making theories.
- Existing models often simplify the complex cognitive and emotional landscape of real-life choices.
- Investigating memory representations offers insights into the subjective experience of decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine memory representations of important real-life decisions.
- To test the applicability of the fuzzy-trace theory of memory and a circumplex model of emotions.
- To compare decision representations between action-oriented and state-oriented individuals.
Main Methods:
- Three studies involved participants recalling important decisions and rating various descriptive characteristics.
- Study 3 specifically compared memory representations between action-oriented and state-oriented decision-makers.
- Analysis focused on abstract vs. concrete characteristics and the presence of positive/negative affect.
Main Results:
- Decision characteristics related to consequences, values, and likelihood were highly applicable, alongside affect/feeling.
- A circumplex model of emotions was not supported; decisions involved both positive and negative affect.
- Abstract characteristics were rated higher than concrete ones, supporting fuzzy-trace theory.
- Action-oriented individuals did not universally score higher on activity; state-oriented individuals showed higher passivity in specific contexts and used more scenario-based representations.
Conclusions:
- Real-life decision memory representations are characterized by both abstract and emotional elements, not fitting simple bipolar or circumplex models.
- Fuzzy-trace theory provides a better framework for understanding the abstract nature of these memory representations.
- Differences exist between action-oriented and state-oriented decision-makers, particularly in the use of passive vs. active representations.
- Future decision theories must closely align with how individuals actually represent decisions in memory.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...
Flashbulb Memory
Autobiographical Memory
Hindsight Biases
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Reason and Intuition
