Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability.

Holli A DeVon1, Michelle E Block, Patricia Moyle-Wright

  • 1Niehoff School of Nursing, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60153, USA. hdevon@luc.edu

Journal of Nursing Scholarship : an Official Publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing
|May 31, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Forecasting the Burden of Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke in Women in the United States Through 2050: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Circulation·2026
Same author

Natural Language Processing Identifies Symptoms Predicting Complete Coronary Artery Occlusion in Patients with NSTEMI.

European journal of cardiovascular nursing·2026
Same author

Message Humanness as a Predictor of AI's Perception as Human: Secondary Data Analysis of the HeartBot Study.

JMIR AI·2026
Same author

Assessment of Discriminant Validity for Measures of Hope and Hopelessness in Adults With an Acute Cardiac Event.

Research in nursing & health·2026
Same author

Myths and Misconceptions in the Assessment and Diagnosis of Type 1 Myocardial Infarction.

AACN advanced critical care·2025
Same author

Human-Delivered Conversation Versus AI Chatbot Conversation in Increasing Heart Attack Knowledge in Women in the United States: Quasi-Experimental Studies.

Journal of medical Internet research·2025

This review highlights common issues in nursing research regarding instrument reliability and validity. Improving psychometric properties is crucial for strengthening study findings and ensuring accurate measurement.

Area of Science:

  • Nursing Research
  • Psychometrics
  • Quantitative Methods

Background:

  • Reliability and validity are foundational concepts in scientific measurement.
  • Ensuring the psychometric soundness of research instruments is essential for generating trustworthy findings.
  • Nursing research often faces challenges in adequately reporting and applying these psychometric principles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the concepts of reliability and validity in nursing research.
  • To provide examples and guidance for enhancing the psychometric properties of research instruments.
  • To report journal editors' suggestions on incorporating psychometric data in manuscripts.

Main Methods:

  • Searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO databases for nursing research articles.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Included quantitative studies from the last 5 years reporting statistical evidence of psychometric properties.
  • Identified studies with strong and weak evidence of instrument psychometric soundness.

    • Main Results:

    • Content validity was frequently reported, but often with insufficient expert review.
    • Criterion and construct validity were underreported, with measurement errors noted.
    • Internal consistency reliability was common, but stability and retest reliability were rarely adequately reported.

    Conclusions:

    • Enhanced planning for psychometric testing and reducing measurement error can improve instrument reliability and validity.
    • Underreporting of validity may stem from small sample sizes, poor design, or resource limitations.
    • Insufficient reporting and misapplication of psychometric testing are prevalent issues in nursing literature.