Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cognitive control acts locally.

Wim Notebaert1, Tom Verguts

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, Henri Dunantlaan 2, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. wim.notebaert@ugent.be

Cognition
|June 1, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adaptive variability in humans, pigeons, and rats.

Psychological review·2026
Same author

Cognitive flexibility versus stability via activation-based and weight-based adaptations.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

Medial Frontal Theta Reduction Impairs Rule Switching via Prediction Error.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Brace yourself: neural and computational insights into the experience of mental effort.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2025
Same author

Different exploration strategies along the autism spectrum: diverging effects of autism diagnosis and autism traits.

Molecular autism·2025
Same author

Learning to be confident: How agents learn confidence based on prediction errors.

Cognition·2025
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Knowability predicts curiosity and learning.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Throwing good effort after bad: Evidence for a sunk-cost effect in cognitive effort-based decision-making.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Cross-linguistic differences in incremental planning under uncertainty.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Sensory attenuation scales with the strength of action-outcome coupling: A psychophysical study.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Cognitive control adapts to tasks. Conflict adaptation occurred differently based on whether tasks shared relevant information, suggesting a local control mechanism.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human behavior

Background:

  • Cognitive control enables flexible information processing aligned with current goals.
  • Conflict adaptation is a key aspect of cognitive control, involving adjustments following detected conflict.
  • Understanding how cognitive control operates across multiple tasks is crucial for explaining adaptive behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate conflict adaptation mechanisms when participants perform two concurrent tasks: the Simon task and the SNARC task.
  • To examine how the nature of relevant information (identical vs. different) in dual tasks influences conflict adaptation.
  • To test the hypothesis of a local control mechanism governing these adaptations.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a dual-task paradigm involving a Simon task and a SNARC task.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Congruency effects (Simon and SNARC) were measured following periods of conflict in either task.
  • The relevant information for both tasks was systematically manipulated to be either identical or different.

    • Main Results:

    • A reduced congruency effect in one task was observed after conflict in the other task, but only when both tasks shared identical relevant information.
    • Conversely, a larger congruency effect was found in one task after conflict in the other when the tasks utilized different relevant information.
    • These findings indicate a context-dependent modulation of conflict adaptation.

    Conclusions:

    • The results support a local control mechanism for cognitive control, where adaptation is specific to the task context and the nature of the processed information.
    • Conflict adaptation is not a global process but is modulated by the overlap of relevant information between concurrent tasks.
    • This research provides insights into the flexible and context-sensitive nature of cognitive control.