Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

11:09
RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
Published on: July 17, 2021
Correlations of random binary sequences with pre-stated operator intention: a review of a 12-year program
Summary
Human intention appears to influence random binary processes, showing subtle but statistically significant correlations. This effect, observed over 12 years, was independent of operator proximity or timing, but absent in deterministic systems.
Area of Science:
- Parapsychology
- Quantum Mechanics
- Information Theory
Background:
- Investigating the potential influence of human consciousness on physical systems.
- Exploring the boundaries between subjective intention and objective physical reality.
- Examining the role of randomness in information processing and its susceptibility to external factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish and quantify correlations between human intention and the output of random binary processes.
- To explore the characteristics and parameters influencing this anomalous effect.
- To differentiate between genuinely random and deterministic pseudorandom sources in this context.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a 12-year experimental program involving over 1000 series across four random device categories.
- Utilized distinctive protocols with approximately 100 human operators, varying proximity and timing.
- Analyzed output distribution means for anomalous shifts compared to chance expectation, including deterministic controls.
Main Results:
- Established strong correlations between operator intentions and random process output means, exceeding 7 sigma.
- Observed consistent effect sizes (approx. 10(-4) bits deviation per bit) and distribution structures across series.
- Found no anomalous effects when using deterministic pseudorandom sources, unlike genuinely random ones.
Conclusions:
- Human intention demonstrates a statistically significant, albeit small, influence on random binary processes.
- This effect is robust across various experimental conditions, including remote operation and different timing.
- The distinction between true randomness and deterministic pseudorandomness is critical for observing this phenomenon.
Related Concept Videos
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I
The Wald-Wolfowitz test, also known as the runs test, is a nonparametric statistical test used to assess the randomness of a sequence of two different types of elements (e.g., positive/negative values, successes/failures). It examines whether the order of the elements in a sequence is random or if there is a pattern or trend present. This nonparametric test applies to any ordered data despite the population and sample data distribution, even if a higher sample size is available.
The test works...
The test works...
Randomized Experiments
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
Signal Sequences and Sorting Receptors
Signal sequences are short amino acid sequences that guide newly synthesized proteins to their proper location within the cell. Classical signal sequences are fifteen to sixty amino acids long and present at the N-terminus of a polypeptide chain. Each signal sequence has a conserved segment of basic residues towards their N terminus, a hydrophobic core, and a C-terminus rich in polar residues. The C-terminus also contains a signal cleavage site and features a -3 -1 sequence motif. The -3-1...
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II
The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
Random and Systematic Errors
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random and Systematic Errors
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
