Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Resource allocation in contemporary paediatrics: the case against high technology.

G V Vimpani1

  • 1University of Newcastle, Area Child and Family Health Services, Hamilton, New South Wales, Australia.

Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
|December 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

High technology in medicine offers benefits but incurs social costs. Current health funding inappropriately favors high-tech solutions over essential, person-intensive interventions, particularly in pediatrics.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Children with disruptive behaviours I: service utilization.

Journal of paediatrics and child health·2002
Same author

Children with disruptive behaviours II: clinical and community service needs.

Journal of paediatrics and child health·2002
Same author

Health departments--pro and con.

Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine·1997
Same author

Prescribing stimulants for disruptive behaviour disorders: sometimes against the best interests of the child?

Journal of paediatrics and child health·1997
Same author

Asthma knowledge, attitudes, and quality of life in adolescents.

Archives of disease in childhood·1995
Same author

Exposure to environmental lead and visual-motor integration at age 7 years: the Port Pirie Cohort Study.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·1995

Area of Science:

  • Medical Technology Assessment
  • Health Economics
  • Pediatric Healthcare Policy

Background:

  • High-technology medical advancements present both benefits and social costs.
  • Resource allocation between high-technology and low-technology healthcare is a significant debate.
  • Current health service funding models are criticized for being imbalanced.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the allocation of resources towards high-technology medical interventions.
  • To examine the arguments against the over-investment in high-technology solutions within pediatrics.
  • To advocate for a more balanced approach to healthcare funding.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of current health service funding trends.
  • Review of the 'technological imperative' in healthcare decision-making.
Keywords:
Health Care and Public Health

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of resource scarcity for non-high-technology interventions.

    • Main Results:

    • The existing balance of health service funding is deemed inappropriate.
    • High-technology solutions address a limited scope of health problems.
    • Resource allocation neglects crucial areas like intersectoral responses and research into person-intensive interventions.

    Conclusions:

    • A shift in healthcare funding is necessary to address a wider range of health issues.
    • Over-reliance on high technology, especially in pediatrics, may not be optimal.
    • Increased investment in person-intensive interventions and research is crucial for equitable healthcare.