Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Assessment of Static Graviceptive Perception in the Roll-Plane using the Subjective Visual Vertical Paradigm
Published on: April 28, 2020
Interaction of posture and conscious perception of gravitational vertical and surface horizontal
W Geoffrey Wright1, Fay B Horak
1Neurological Sciences Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, 505 NW 185th Avenue, Beaverton, OR 97006-3499, USA. wrightw@ohsu.edu
Abstract:
The extent to which postural orientation and perception of orientation share common central processes is unknown. If central resources are shared, automatic postural orientation in space and conscious perception of gravitational vertical (GV) or surface horizontal (SH) orientation should vary similarly with changing frequencies of surface tilts. Furthermore, shared central processing may result in altered postural orientation depending on the focus of conscious perception. Blindfolded, healthy subjects indicated perception of gravitational vertical and surface horizontal while standing on a tilting surface or sitting in an earth-fixed chair with only the feet on the tilting surface. Subjects oriented a hand-held rod to GV or perpendicular to the tilting support surface to indicate SH during anterior-posterior (A/P) sinusoidal surface tilt oscillation (+/-5 degrees /0.025-0.4 Hz). The gain and phase relationships of rod and postural tilt with respect to surface tilt were analyzed in all conditions. Average rod-tilt during the GV task was below 1.5 degrees and decreased with increasing frequency of surface oscillation, similar to the decrease in trunk tilt. Average rod-tilt when indicating SH was three to four times that of actual surface tilt during both sitting and standing postures and did not change across frequencies, unlike trunk tilt. Measures of postural stability were less variable during the GV than the SH task. This increased postural stability during the GV task and similar gain/phase patterns of postural and GV perceptual orientation across frequencies is consistent with shared central processing of automatic postural and conscious perception of orientation to gravity. In contrast, different gain/phase patterns of posture and conscious perception of SH orientation are consistent with separate processing of postural responses of changing surface orientation and perception of it. Conscious perception of sensory inputs related to verticality share central processing with postural control, which when accessed can have a stabilizing effect, whereas consciously perceiving a moving support surface can be destabilizing.
Related Concept Videos
Center of Gravity
Center of Gravity
To determine its location, the principle of moments can be utilized by dividing the object into...
Responses to Gravity and Touch
Variation in Acceleration due to Gravity near the Earth's Surface
The difference between the true and apparent weights is proportional to the square of the Earth's angular speed. Since the...
Gravitational Potential Energy
Gestalt Principles of Perception

