Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
[Cardioresynchronizing therapy in treatment of cardiac insufficiency]
Insights
Cardioresynchronizing therapy (CRT) improves survival and quality of life in patients with cardiac insufficiency (CI) and intraventricular conduction delays. Further research is needed to optimize patient selection and CRT programming for maximum benefit.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Technology
Context:
- Cardiac insufficiency (CI) and intraventricular conduction delays present significant challenges in patient management.
- Existing randomized studies and meta-analyses provide valuable data on cardioresynchronizing therapy (CRT).
Purpose:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of cardioresynchronizing therapy (CRT) in patients diagnosed with cardiac insufficiency (CI) and intraventricular conductivity disorder.
- To analyze the results and drawbacks of completed randomized studies and meta-analyses concerning CRT.
Summary:
- CRT demonstrates increased survival rates by slowing CI progression and reducing overall mortality, even without a defibrillation function.
- High efficacy and safety of CRT are evident in patients with CI and severe systolic dysfunction, significantly improving quality of life (7.6-8 points).
Impact:
- CRT offers a significant benefit for patients with Class III-IV CI, enhancing their quality of life.
- Further investigation is required to refine patient selection criteria, optimize stimulation modes, and determine CRT's efficacy in specific patient subgroups, including those with chronic atrial arrhythmias.
Abstract:
The authors analyze the effectiveness of cardioresynchronizing therapy (CRT) in patients with cardiac insufficiency (CI) and intraventricular conductivity disorder. The results of completed randomized studies (CONTAK-CD, MIRACLE-ICD, MUSTIC-AF, RD-CHF, COMPANION, PATH-CHF, PATH-CHF II, MUSTIC-SR, MIRACLE, MUSTIC-AF, CARE-HF) and their metanalysis are evaluated; drawbacks of these studies are demonstrated. CRT has been demonstrated to increase survival rate due to slowing down CI progress; total mortality falls thanks to CRT even without defibrillation function. High efficacy and safety of CRT in patients with CI and profound systolic dysfunction have been demonstrated; quality of life increases by 7.6 points and by 8 points in patients with III to IV functional class CI. At the same time, there is a need for additional investigations of CRT for adequate selection of patients and optimization of stimulation modes. It is not quite clear yet for what functional class CI CRT will be most effective, which criterion is most important for patient selection, whether biventricular stimulation has advantages over left-ventricular one, and whether it is necessary to stimulate the atriums or their detection is enough. Few studies on chronic atrial arrhythmias have been conducted, thus it is not known to which extent CRT is effective in this category of patients.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

