Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Release from interference in auditory working memory for pitch.

Dennis T Ries1, Jeffery J DiGiovanni

  • 1Auditory Perception Laboratory, W241 Grover Center, School of Hearing, Speech, and Language Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA. ries@ohio.edu

Hearing Research
|June 19, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pspan: A New Tool for Assessing Pitch Temporal Processing and Patterning Capacity.

American journal of audiology·2019
Same author

Exploration of Head Related Transfer Function and Environmental Sounds as a Means to Improve Auditory Scanning for Children Requiring Augmentative and Alternative Communication.

Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA·2019
Same author

Dominance of persistence over adaptation in forward masking.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2018
Same author

Release from retroactive retention interference for acoustic duration.

Perception·2014
Same author

Retention of gap length in normal-hearing listeners.

Perception·2014
Same author

The effects of intervening interference on working memory for sound location as a function of inter-comparison interval.

Hearing research·2010
Same journal

Multivariate prediction of conductive dysfunction in well and NICU newborns using wideband acoustic immittance with acoustic reflex tests.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

TGF-β signaling regulates flat epithelium formation in severely injured adult mouse utricle through epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Membrane scaffolding in auditory hair cells - a molecular tightrope walk enables lateral wall stiffness and flexibility.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Speech-in-noise recognition during hearing protector use: Human performance and acoustic prediction.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Estimation of hair cell loss from audiograms.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Cochlear size variation in a large-scale international multicentre cohort.

Hearing research·2026
See all related articles

Interpolated tones significantly impair pitch memory, nearly tripling the just noticeable difference for frequency. Sound localization cues partially mitigate this interference, suggesting integrated auditory processing.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory neuroscience
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Human perception

Background:

  • Auditory working memory is crucial for processing sequential sounds.
  • Interference from intervening stimuli can degrade pitch information.
  • The role of sound localization cues in auditory memory is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the impact of interpolated tones on pitch standards in auditory working memory.
  • To measure the difference limen (just noticeable difference) for frequency.
  • To assess the effectiveness of "Where" cues in reducing interference.

Main Methods:

  • Method of constant stimuli was used to measure the difference limen for frequency.
  • Tones with identical and disparate localization cues were presented during the retention interval.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants' differential sensitivity for frequency was assessed.

    • Main Results:

    • The difference limen for frequency nearly tripled with interpolated tones.
    • Sound localization cues provided a significant partial release from interference.
    • Interference from "Where" cues ranged from 4.0 to 5.2 Hz.

    Conclusions:

    • Interpolated tones significantly impair pitch maintenance in auditory working memory.
    • "Where" cues can partially ameliorate this interference, indicating a role for sound localization.
    • Findings suggest integrative processing between auditory "What" and "Where" pathways for pitch information.