Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Technical Applications of Microelectrode Array and Patch Clamp Recordings on Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes
Published on: August 4, 2022
Preclinical cardiac safety assessment of drugs
1Pfizer Global Research and Development, Amboise, France. gilles.hanton@pfizer.com
Abstract:
The heart is a frequent site of toxicity of pharmaceutical compounds in humans, and when developing a new drug it is critical to conduct a thorough preclinical evaluation of its possible adverse effects on cardiac structure and function. Changes in cardiac morphology such as myocardial necrosis, hypertrophy or valvulopathy are assessed in regulatory toxicity studies in laboratory animals, although specific models may be needed for a more accurate detection of the risk. The potential proarrhythmic risk of new drugs is a major subject of concern and needs to be fully addressed before treatment of volunteers or patients takes place. In vitro assays are conducted to determine the effects on cardiac ion channels, in particular I(Kr) potassium channel antagonism. Prolongation of the QT interval is assessed in vivo, generally in telemetered dogs. Together, these two tests are considered to detect most arrhythmic drugs. The results of this core battery can be refined by additional studies, in particular assays on isolated cardiac tissues determining changes in cardiac action potential duration, shape and variability over time. Triggering of arrhythmia is assessed in hypokalaemic dogs with artificially created bradycardia, or in vitro in isolated whole hearts. The proarrhythmic risk of the new compound is then evaluated by integrating the results of these different tests. Drug adverse effects on cardiac electrophysiological function, in particular impulse formation and conduction, are evaluated through changes in ECG, generally recorded in dogs, pigs or monkeys. Changes in cardiac contractility occurring either as a primary effect of the drug on cardiac function or as a consequence of cardiac lesions should also be carefully assessed. In telemetered or anaesthetised animals, cardiac contractility is evaluated by measurement of left ventricular pressure and its first derivative over time. Echocardiography allows non-invasive measurement of drug-induced changes in ventricular wall movements and cardiac haemodynamics indicative of effects on contractility. In conclusion, a reliable and accurate evaluation of the cardiac safety of a new pharmaceutical agent is based on the results of in vitro tests, with overall moderate to high throughput, and in vivo experiments assessing the effects of the drug on the heart in its physiological environment. The specific sensitivities of the animals used in these assays to cardiac adverse effects should also be considered. The final evaluation of the cardiac risk is therefore based on an integrated analysis of the results from a battery of tests.
Insights
Preclinical cardiac safety testing uses in vitro and in vivo studies to assess drug effects on heart structure, function, and electrical activity, ensuring patient safety before clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular toxicology
- Drug safety evaluation
- Preclinical pharmacology
Background:
- The heart is a common target for drug toxicity, necessitating thorough preclinical assessment.
- Evaluating potential adverse effects on cardiac structure, function, and electrophysiology is critical during drug development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline a comprehensive preclinical strategy for evaluating the cardiac safety of new pharmaceutical agents.
- To integrate various in vitro and in vivo assays for accurate risk assessment.
Main Methods:
- In vitro assays assessing effects on cardiac ion channels (e.g., I(Kr) antagonism).
- In vivo studies including QT interval monitoring in telemetered dogs, ECG in various species, and cardiac contractility measurements (e.g., ventricular pressure, echocardiography).
- Additional assays on isolated cardiac tissues and whole hearts to evaluate action potential duration, arrhythmia triggering, and electrophysiological function.
Main Results:
- A core battery of tests, including ion channel assays and in vivo QT interval assessment, identifies most proarrhythmic drugs.
- Integrated analysis of diverse in vitro and in vivo data refines the evaluation of cardiac electrophysiological and morphological risks.
- Animal model sensitivities to cardiac adverse effects must be considered for accurate risk interpretation.
Conclusions:
- A reliable cardiac safety evaluation relies on a combination of in vitro and in vivo tests conducted in the drug's physiological context.
- Integrating results from multiple assays provides a robust assessment of a new drug's potential cardiac risks.
- Comprehensive preclinical cardiac safety testing is essential for protecting patient health.
Related Concept Videos
Preclinical Development: Overview
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Clinical Trials: Overview
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT

