Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
Biomarker-adaptive threshold design: a procedure for evaluating treatment with possible biomarker-defined subset
Wenyu Jiang1, Boris Freidlin, Richard Simon
1Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, EPN-8122, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Background:
Many molecularly targeted anticancer agents entering the definitive stage of clinical development benefit only a subset of treated patients. This may lead to missing effective agents by the traditional broad-eligibility randomized trials due to the dilution of the overall treatment effect. We propose a statistically rigorous biomarker-adaptive threshold phase III design for settings in which a putative biomarker to identify patients who are sensitive to the new agent is measured on a continuous or graded scale.
Methods:
The design combines a test for overall treatment effect in all randomly assigned patients with the establishment and validation of a cut point for a prespecified biomarker of the sensitive subpopulation. The performance of the biomarker-adaptive design, relative to a traditional design that ignores the biomarker, was evaluated in a simulation study. The biomarker-adaptive design was also used to analyze data from a prostate cancer trial.
Results:
In the simulation study, the biomarker-adaptive design preserved the power to detect the overall effect when the new treatment is broadly effective. When the proportion of sensitive patients as identified by the biomarker is low, the proposed design provided a substantial improvement in efficiency compared with the traditional trial design. Recommendations for sample size planning and implementation of the biomarker-adaptive design are provided.
Conclusions:
A statistically valid test for a biomarker-defined subset effect can be prospectively incorporated into a randomized phase III design without compromising the ability to detect an overall effect if the intervention is beneficial in a broad population.
Insights
This study introduces a biomarker-adaptive trial design to improve the efficiency of identifying effective anticancer agents in sensitive patient subsets. This method enhances power when only a small group benefits, unlike traditional trials.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trial Design
- Oncology
Background:
- Many targeted cancer therapies benefit only specific patient groups.
- Traditional trials may miss effective agents due to diluted treatment effects in broad populations.
- Biomarkers can identify sensitive subpopulations for targeted therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a statistically rigorous biomarker-adaptive threshold Phase III design.
- To address challenges in evaluating targeted therapies with patient subsets.
- To identify sensitive patient populations using continuous or graded biomarkers.
Main Methods:
- Combined overall treatment effect testing with biomarker cut-point establishment and validation.
- Evaluated biomarker-adaptive design performance against traditional designs via simulation.
- Applied the biomarker-adaptive design to a prostate cancer clinical trial dataset.
Main Results:
- The adaptive design maintained power for overall treatment effects in broadly effective treatments.
- Significant efficiency gains were observed with the adaptive design when the sensitive population was small.
- Provided recommendations for sample size and implementation of the adaptive design.
Conclusions:
- A biomarker-defined subset effect test can be integrated into Phase III designs.
- This integration does not compromise the ability to detect overall treatment benefits.
- The proposed design offers a statistically valid approach for targeted therapy evaluation.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Drug Analysis Methods
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Overview and Classification
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors