Gap duration discrimination for frequency-asymmetric gap markers: psychophysical and electrophysiological findings

This study investigated gap duration discrimination (GDD) for frequency-asymmetric gap markers, where one marker was a two-tone complex consisting of a primary tone and a secondary tone, and the other marker was the primary tone alone. Three experiments were undertaken to examine the order effect wherein performance is better when the two-tone marker is the leading marker than when it is the trailing marker. Experiment 1 demonstrated that GDD for frequency-asymmetric markers is intermediate between the boundaries of within-frequency-channel versus across-frequency-channel processing. Experiment 2 compared psychophysical performance with auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) elicited by the same stimuli. Whereas GDD thresholds were elevated for a complex trailing marker relative to a within-frequency-channel baseline, ABRs elicited by the complex marker were more robust. Experiment 3 tested the hypothesis that poor GDD performance with frequency-asymmetric markers is due to some form of nonenergetic, or informational, masking. The results did not support a role for informational masking conferred by synthetic listening; however, informational masking conferred by the occurrence of novel spectral events provided a parsimonious account. One possible interpretation is that the capacity to accurately encode a gap is undermined by the occurrence of novel spectral events that engage limited attentional resources.